Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 3614 Del
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2015
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 5th May, 2015
+ MAC.APP. 477/2012
BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCE CO. LTD. ...... Appellant
Through: Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. with
Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv.
versus
GAJRAJ & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Adv. for
R-1 & R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The appeal is directed against the judgment dated 03.02.2012 passed
by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal)
whereby compensation of `8,02,148/- was awarded in favour of
Respondents no.1 and 2 for the death of Bhupender, who suffered fatal
injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 28.04.2007.
2. It is an admitted case of the parties that deceased Bhupender suffered
fatal injuries while he was driving Mahindra Champion bearing
registration no.DL-1CF-8470.
3. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that deceased
Bhupender was not a third party. He himself was the driver of the
vehicle involved in the accident and the vehicle's Insurance Company
was not liable to pay the compensation.
4. Copy of the insurance policy is placed on record which shows that an
additional premium of `50/- was paid for covering the risk of two
employees for operation and maintenance of the vehicle. In view of
this, risk of the driver under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923
(the Act) was covered.
5. Learned counsel for Respondents no. 1 and 2 fairly concedes that
Respondents no.1 and 2 would be entitled to compensation without
proof of negligence under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923.
6. Salary of deceased Bhupender was stated by PW-1 (father of the
deceased) to be `3200/- per month on the date of the accident. The
compensation payable as per Section 4 of the Act as enforceable at the
time of the accident on 28.04.2007 comes to `3,62,208/- (3200/- x ½ x
226.38/- (factor on the age of 18 as per Schedule 4).
7. Respondents no.1 and 2 shall be entitled to interest @ 12% per annum
w.e.f. 28.05.2007 till the date of deposit of the amount in this Court.
8. The amount held payable shall be payable to Respondents no.1 and 2
in equal proportion.
9. An amount of `1,72,555/- each has already been released in favour of
Respondents no.1 and 2. The balance amount payable shall be
released forthwith.
10. The excess amount shall be refunded to the Appellant Insurance
Company.
11. The appeal is allowed in above terms.
12. Statutory amount, if any, deposited shall be refunded to the Appellant
Insurance Company.
13. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE MAY 05, 2015 vk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!