Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Dugar Capital Services ... vs ...
2015 Latest Caselaw 2451 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 2451 Del
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2015

Delhi High Court
M/S. Dugar Capital Services ... vs ... on 23 March, 2015
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
                  COMPANY PETITION NO. 663/2014

                                      Reserved on 26th February, 2015
                             Date of pronouncement: 23rd March, 2015
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):

And

Petition under Sections 391(2) & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956

Scheme of Amalgamation of:

M/s. Dugar Capital Services Private Limited
                                    Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1

M/s. Hina Overseas Private Limited
                                     Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2

      WITH

M/s. Dipankur Ceroils Private Limited
                                          Petitioner/Transferee Company

                               Through Mr. P. K. Mittal and Ms. Mehak
                               Gupta, Advocates for the petitioners
                               Ms.     Aparna     Mudiam,    Assistant
                               Registrar of Companies for the
                               Regional Director
                               Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
                               Official Liquidator

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391(2) & 394 of

the Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction

of the Scheme of Amalgamation of M/s. Dugar Capital Services Private

Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 1) and

M/s.Hina Overseas Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the

transferor company no. 2) with M/s. Dipankur Ceroils Private Limited

(hereinafter referred to as the transferee company).

2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies

are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this court.

3. The transferor company no. 1 was incorporated under the

Companies Act, 1956 on 13th August, 1993 with the Registrar of

Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

4. The transferor company no. 2 was incorporated under the

Companies Act, 1956 on 12th October, 1993 with the Registrar of

Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

5. The transferee company was incorporated under the Companies

Act, 1956 on 29th July, 1994 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of

Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

6. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company

no.1 is Rs.2,80,00,000/- divided into 28,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-

each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company

is Rs.2,80,00,000/- divided into 28,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

7. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company

no.2 is Rs.2,10,00,000/- divided into 21,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-

each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company

is Rs.1,78,11,360/- divided into 17,81,136 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

8. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is

Rs.2,01,00,000/- divided into 20,10,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is

Rs.74,23,550/- divided into 7,42,355 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

9. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the

transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the

joint application, being CA(M) 141/2014, earlier filed by the petitioners.

The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferor

and transferee companies, along with the report of the auditors, had also

been filed.

10. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record

and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and

detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is submitted by

the petitioners that the transferor companies are subsidiaries of the

transferee company and the proposed amalgamation would create

greater synergies between the businesses of these three companies and

would enable them to manage their business more efficiently by

effectively pooling the technical and marketing skills of both the

companies as an integrated entity and also enable effective management

and unified control of operations. It is claimed that the proposed

amalgamation will result in creating better synergies and optimal

utilization of resources built by the transferor companies and provide

better administration and cost reduction.

11. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme

provides that 98.33% share capital of the transferor company no. 1 is

held by the transferee company and balance 1.67% share capital is held

by the transferor company no. 2. Further, the transferor company no. 2 is

a wholly owned subsidiary of the transferee company. Therefore, upon

coming into effect of this Scheme, the share capital of both the transferor

companies will stand automatically cancelled, extinguished and there will

be no issue and allotment of shares of the transferee company.

12. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under

Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the

transferor and transferee companies.

13. The Board of Directors of the transferor company no. 1, transferor

company no. 2 and the transferee company in their separate meetings

held on 18th September, 2014, 19th September, 2014 and 18th

September, 2014 respectively have unanimously approved the proposed

Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the Resolutions passed at the

meetings of the Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee

companies have been placed on record.

14. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 141/2014

seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of

convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and

unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the

Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 14th October, 2014, this

court allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of

convening and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders and

unsecured creditors of the transferor and transferee companies, there

being no secured creditors of the petitioner companies, to consider and, if

thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme

of Amalgamation.

15. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition

seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 14th

November, 2014, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the

Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations

were also directed to be published in 'Statesman' (English) and 'Veer

Arjun' (Hindi) editions. The petitioners have filed the affidavit showing

publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 1st December,

2014. Copies of the newspaper clippings containing the publications have

been filed along with the said affidavit.

16. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought

information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information

received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 23rd February,

2015 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint

against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party

interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the

transferor companies no. 1 & 2 do not appear to have been conducted in

a manner prejudicial to the interest of their members, creditors or public

interest, as per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act,

1956.

17. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.

Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate

Affairs has filed his report dated 24th February, 2015. Relying on Clause

4.2(h) of Part-II of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the

Scheme of Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor companies

no. 1 & 2 shall become the employees of the transferee company without

any break or interruption in their services. He has further submitted that

in Clause 7 of Part-II the Scheme, it has been stated that the transferee

company shall follow the method of accounting as prescribed for Pooling

of Interest method under Accounting Standard-14 as notified under the

Companies Accounting Rules, 2006. He further submitted that in Clause

8 of Part-II of the Scheme, it has been stated that upon this scheme

becoming effective, the transferor companies no. 1 & 2 shall stand

dissolved without the process of winding up.

18. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation

from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 12th

February, 2015 of Mr. V. K. Saxena, Director of the petitioner companies,

have submitted that the petitioner companies have not received any

objection pursuant to the citations published in the newspapers on 1st

December, 2014.

19. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders and

unsecured creditors of the petitioner companies to the proposed Scheme

of Amalgamation and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director,

Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator not raising any objection to

the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no

impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation.

Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of

Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner companies will comply with the statutory requirements in

accordance with law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the

Registrar of Companies within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order

will not be construed as an order granting exemption from payment of

stamp duty as payable in accordance with law. Upon the sanction

becoming effective from the appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st

April, 2014, the transferor companies no. 1 & 2 shall stand dissolved

without undergoing the process of winding up.

20. The petition is allowed in the above terms.

Dasti.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

March 23, 2015

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter