Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 2351 Del
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2015
$~39.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 1285/2008
SMT. RAMESH DEVI ARORA ..... Plaintiff
Through: None
versus
SMT. ANITA SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate
for D-1.
Mr. V. Sudeer, Advocate for D-2/Bank.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 19.03.2015
1. On the last date of hearing, counsel for the plaintiff had sought
an adjournment on the ground that for the past several dates, he had
not been receiving any instructions from his client, who is residing in
United Kingdom and he would be taking steps to file an application for
seeking discharge in the case.
2. Neither is the counsel for the plaintiff present today, nor has an
application for discharge been filed. It appears that the plaintiff is not
interested in prosecuting the present suit, which is accordingly
dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
HIMA KOHLI, J MARCH 19, 2015 rkb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!