Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 2347 Del
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Order delivered on: 19th March, 2015
+ BAIL APPLN. 1467/2014
R K MADAAN ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Lalit Gupta, Adv. and
Mr. Ashish Kumar, Ms.
Garima Goel, Advs.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent
Through Mr.M.P. Singh, APP for State
SI Vikram Singh, PS
Mianwali Nagar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
MANMOHAN SINGH, J.
1. The present application has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 438 & 482 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest/anticipatory bail with directions to the Investigating Officer/SHO in case FIR No.330/2014, under Sections 120B/420/448/511 IPC registered at P.S. Mianwali Nagar, Delhi pursuant to the complaint case filed by Megha Narula under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to release the petitioner in the event of their arrest in the said case.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant/Megha Narula alleged in the present FIR that the petitioner in collusion with one Raj Kumar Chandra has done illegal acts to grab the
property bearing Flat No. 198, 3rd floor, under MIG category situated at Peera Garhi, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the "suit property"). It is further alleged that the petitioner along with Raj Kumar Chandra has been pressurizing the complainant to hand over the physical possession of the suit property.
3. Thereafter the complainant along with the co-owner namely Smt. Santosh Gupta filed a Civil Suit No. 209/2011 before the Civil Judge, Tis Hazari Courts titled as "Santosh Gupta & Anr. vs. R.K.Madaan & Ors." seeking relief of permanent injunction against the petitioner and other co-defendants qua the suit property which is still pending.
4. Raj Kumar Chandra/co-accused in the present FIR also filed a Civil Suit bearing C.S.(OS) No. 1484/2012 titled as "R.K.Chandra vs. R.K.Madaan &Ors." before this Court against the petitioner, the complainant and her husband qua the suit property seeking reliefs of specific performance and permanent injunction which is still pending.
5. Thereafter Raj Kumar Chandra got registered another FIR No. 135/2011 dated 3rd June, 2011 at P.S. Mianwali Nagar against the petitioner under Section 420/34 IPC and Section 3(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 alleging disputes with respect to the suit property. By order dated 9th June, 2011 anticipatory bail was granted by the Learned Trial Court. In the meanwhile, the complainant made a complaint to the Commission of S.C. and
S.T. and on the direction of S.C. and S.T. Commission Section 3(1) of S.C. and S.T. Act was added in the above said FIR. Thereafter the petitioner filed Bail Application 485/2012 before this Court wherein the petitioner was also granted anticipatory bail by order dated 13th April, 2012.
6. In view of the above, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail in FIR No. 330/2014.
7. The interim order dated 3rd July, 2014 is made absolute.
8. The petition is disposed of.
(MANMOHAN SINGH) JUDGE MARCH 19, 2015
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!