Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 2273 Del
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2015
$~20.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 1576/2014 and I.A. 10241, 2014, 10242/2014,
10244/2014 and 16306/2014
SHALINI ARORA ..... Plaintiff
Through: None
versus
JASWANT & OTHERS ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Advocate with
Mr. Sanjay Aggarwal, Advocate for D-3.
Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Advocate for
Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for D-8/DDA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 17.03.2015
1. The suit was passed over on the first call as none was present
on behalf of the plaintiff. Same is the position on the second call.
Pertinently, on the last date of hearing, the plaintiff was directed to
take fresh steps to serve the defendant No.4 by filing the process fee.
As per the Registry, the process fee has not been filed.
2. It appears that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the
present suit, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-
prosecution alongwith the pending applications.
HIMA KOHLI, J MARCH 17, 2015 rkb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!