Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Devender Kumar vs Gnct Of Delhi And Anr.
2015 Latest Caselaw 1951 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 1951 Del
Judgement Date : 5 March, 2015

Delhi High Court
Devender Kumar vs Gnct Of Delhi And Anr. on 5 March, 2015
Author: Suresh Kait
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                            Judgment delivered on: 5th March, 2015

+                             W.P. (C) No. 1978/2010

        DEVENDER KUMAR                                    ..... Petitioner

                              Represented by:    Mr. N.S.Dalal, Adv.

                              versus

        GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR.                         ..... Respondents

                         Represented by:   Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT


SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions whereby directing the respondents to cancel the allotment of flat No.32, Block C, Sector-7, Pocket-2, Dwarka allotted to some unknown lady by impersonation of petitioner's mother.

2. The petitioner further seeks direction thereby directing the respondent to allot flat under the "Housing Scheme for Rehabilitation of Punjab Migrants" to the petitioner.

3. It is pertinent to note that the present petition was dismissed vide order dated 17.01.2014. The petitioner being aggrieved challenged the same in LPA No.239/2014, the same was disposed of vide order dated 14.03.2014, whereby, while setting aside the

order dated 17.01.2014, directed this Court to decide afresh on merits.

4. It is further pertinent to note that Smt. Raj Rani, respondent No.3 has been served by way of publication and citation, however, none had appeared on her behalf. Accordingly, the said respondent was proceeded ex-parte.

5. It is averred in the writ petition that the petitioner's father Shri Teerath Ram Sharma had migrated to Delhi on 28.01.1987 on account of terrorist activities taking place in the State of Punjab. On 13.03.1989, he was allotted a semi-pucca accommodation bearing No.D-507 at Peeragarhi Relief Camp and on 23.08.1989, he was issued a ration card by Delhi Administration. He was provided free water and electricity, being a migrant, evidenced by a letter dated March 13, 1989. Ration Card stated to have been issued in his name showing his wife Smt. Raj Rani, son Devinder Kumar and Tripta Rani, his daughter-in-law; being dependents on him. The abovenamed Tirath Ram died and was survived by his wife and son as his legal heirs. His wife Raj Rani also died on June 17, 2000. Thus, the petitioner has remained the sole successor-in- interest.

6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that an imposter claiming herself to be Smt. Raj Rani submitted an application No.3613 and pursuant thereto on September 29, 2002 a flat at Dwarka was allotted to said Raj Rani and thereafter possession was handed over to her. Therefore,

possession of the flat is required from the imposter and possession of the same be handed over to the petitioner after substituting his name in place of his father.

7. Concededly, the lady named Smt. Raj Rani wife of Tirath Ram died on June 17, 2000. She could not be the one who could have submitted the documents to DDA in the year 2002. She could not have received any challan on January 31, 2003. It is not in dispute that the person who migrated from Punjab was Teerath Ram.

8. The respondent/DDA in its counter-affidavit submitted that the allotment letter dated 29.09.2002 was issued by DDA at the residential address of Smt. Raj Rani as C-371, Peeragarhi Relief Camp. The said address was entirely different from the address given by the petitioner, i.e. D-507, Peeragarhi Relief Camp. In the list of 3120 Punjab Migrants, there was no entry of Smt. Raj Rani against the address provided as C-371, Peeragarhi Camp. DDA made allotment on the basis of scrutiny of all the documents available. It is further stated that a letter dated 14.03.2011 was sent to Smt. Raj Rani at the address C-371, Peeragarhi Relief Camp, which was received back undelivered as there was no such person at address bearing No.C-371, Peeragarhi Camp.

9. It is pertinent to note that vide order dated 09.09.2013 passed by this Court, the Chief Vigilance Officer, DDA was directed to conduct an internal inquiry and file a report along with affidavit. Accordingly, Shri T.Srinidhi, Chief Vigilance Officer, DDA filed

its report whereby stated that the then SDM, Punjabi Bagh had issued a recommendation letter in favour of Smt. Raj Rani, wife of Shri Tirath Ram, resident of Pvt. Camp C-371, Peera Gari Camp. Further stated that Smt. Raj Rani applied in the Housing Scheme for Rehabilitation of Punjab Migrants on 18.09.2002 along with aforesaid Recommendation letter, affidavit and bank demand draft bearing No.074707 of Rs.10,000/- and on the basis of this a flat bearing no.32, Block C, Pocket-2, Sector-7, Dwarka was allotted vide demand letter No.20870 with block date 05.12.2002- 10.12.2002. On the deposit of demanded amount and completion of formalities such as affidavit, undertaking, three specimen signatures duly attested, third copy of challan No.23127 dated 31.01.2003 and copy of ration card No.02350 dated 10.05.1991 in the name of Smt. Raj Rani, wife of Tirath Ram, resident of C-371, Pvt. Tent, Peera Gari Camp, possession letter and NOC were issued on 10.02.2003. Thereafter, possession was handed over on 24.02.2003.

10. It is established from the above report that a list of 3120 migrants received from SDM, Punjabi Bagh on 15.10.2003 in which name of Smt. Raj Rani, wife of Shri Tirath Ram exists at Sl. No.1377 against the address D-507, Peera Garhi, instead of C-371, Peera Garhi. It is further established that the SDM, Punjabi Bagh had sent wrong recommendation instead of recommendation of mother of the petitioner. It is also established that the name of the mother of the petitioner at Sl. No. 1377 is against the address D- 507, Peera Garhi. The address in the allotment i.e, C-371,

Peeragarhi does not exist and no other person has come forward to claim the allotment of the flat in question.

11. Counsel for the DDA has submitted that the possession of the said flat was given to Smt. Raj Rani, wife of Shri Teerath Ram, Resident of C-371, Peera Garhi on 24.02.2003. However, neither such lady nor said address exists there.

12. Thus, it seems some unknown person has played fraud with DDA and tried to usurp the right of the mother of the petitioner. This has been established from the report of the Chief Vigilance Officer, DDA and submissions made by counsel for the petitioner.

13. Accordingly, the said flat was to be allotted in the name of Smt. Raj Rani the mother of the petitioner, however, she had died in the year 2000 itself.

14. In view of the above discussion, I direct the respondent/DDA to cancel the allotment of Flat No.32, Block-C, Pocket 2, Sector-7, Dwarka, which was allotted to some non-existing lady staying at the non-existing address of C-371, Peera Garhi.

15. I further direct, DDA shall issue allotment letter in favour of the petitioner Devender Kumar, being the sole legal heir of Late Shri Teerath Ram and his wife Late Smt. Raj Rani, after completing all formalities and as per the scheme.

16. I hereby make it clear that DDA shall allot the flat on the same rates allotted to imposter Smt. Raj Rani.

17. The petition is allowed accordingly with no order as to costs.

SURESH KAIT (JUDGE)

March 05, 2015 'sn'/RS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter