Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 5033 Del
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2015
$~34.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 693/2011
M/S AUSTER CONSULTING(P) LTD ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Kamal Bansal, Advocate
with Mr.Ankur Garg, Advocate alongwith
Mr. Hardeep Kakkar, Director of the
plaintiff/company in person.
versus
M/S ITC LIMITED & OTHERS ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Anirudh Arunkumar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 15.07.2015
I.A. 13934/2015 (by the plaintiff u/O XXIII R 3 CPC)
1. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff stating
inter alia that pursuant to the parties being referred to Delhi High
Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, they have arrived at a
settlement as recorded in the Settlement Agreement dated
12.05.2015 (Annexure A), whereunder against a decree for a sum of
Rs.20,13,560/- prayed for by the plaintiff against the defendants, the
plaintiff has agreed to receive a sum of Rs.7 lacs from the defendants
in full and final settlement.
2. Learned counsel for the defendants confirms the fact that his
clients are willing to suffer a decree to the tune of Rs.7 lacs in terms of
the settlement arrived at with the plaintiff. He states that he has
brought a cheque bearing No.037051 for Rs.6,37,700/- dated
26.05.2015 drawn on HDFC Bank, Sarat Bose Road, Central Plaza,
Kolkata, in favour of the plaintiff, after deducting the TDS. He states
that the TDS certificate shall be furnished to the plaintiff within one
month from today. He assures the Court that when presented, the
cheque shall be duly honoured. Counsels for the parties state that in
view of the settlement arrived at between them, the suit may be
disposed of.
3. The Court has pursued the Settlement Agreement dated
12.05.2015 enclosed with the present application and marked as
Annexure A. The same has been signed by the Managing Director of
the plaintiff/company, authorized representatives of the defendants
and their respective counsels as also by the learned Mediator.
Enclosed with the Settlement Agreement, is a Power of Attorney
executed on behalf of the defendants in favour of the signatory to the
Settlement Agreement.
4. As counsels for the parties jointly state that their clients have
arrived at the aforesaid settlement of their own free will and volition
and without any undue influence or coercion from any quarters, there
appears no legal impediment in accepting the said settlement. The
parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the
settlement recorded in the Settlement Agreement.
5. The suit is disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at and
recorded in the Settlement Agreement dated 12.05.2015, while
leaving the parties to bear their own expenses.
6. At this stage, learned counsel for the plaintiff states that as the
settlement through mediation has been negotiated by the parties prior
to the issues being framed in the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to claim
refund of the court fees in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.
7. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the counsel for the
plaintiff, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate in favour of the
plaintiff for refund of the court fees, as per law.
8. The suit is disposed of, along with the pending application.
File be consigned to the record room.
HIMA KOHLI, J JULY 15, 2015 rkb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!