Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Veena Chhibber vs Dvb Employee Terminal Benefit ...
2015 Latest Caselaw 1434 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 1434 Del
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2015

Delhi High Court
Veena Chhibber vs Dvb Employee Terminal Benefit ... on 19 February, 2015
Author: Valmiki J. Mehta
*            IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                         W.P.(C) No.3511/2014

%                                                    19th February, 2015

VEENA CHHIBBER                                              ..... Petitioner
                          Through:       Counsel for the petitioner (appearance
                                         not given).

                                Versus

DVB EMPLOYEE TERMINAL BENEFIT FUND-2002 (PENSION
TRUST) AND ANR.                            ..... Respondents
                Through: Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Advocate with
                         Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate for
                         respondent No.1.
                         Mr. Prashant Mehta, Advocate with
                         Ms. Bhumika Aggarwal, Advocate for
                         respondent No.2.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?


VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.           After arguments, this petition filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India is pressed only to the extent of seeking correction in

the impugned letter dated 13.12.2012 that the period for recovery should not

be from 1.10.2004 to 16.2.2006 but should only be from 1.10.2004 to

28.12.2005 inasmuch as on 28.12.2005 the accommodation in question

WP(C) 3511/2014                                                      Page 1 of 3
 being C-6, Type-III, DTL Colony, Timarpur, Delhi stood duly allotted to Sh.

Sanjay Chibber, son of the petitioner. This letter dated 28.12.2005 reads as

under:-

  "No.F.DTL/1011/2005-HR(DM(A)I)/294                     Dt:28-12-2005
  Dy. General Manager (Admn.)
  North Delhi Power Ltd,
  S/Stn. Building, Hudson Lines,
  Kingsway Camp, Delhi-09

  Subject:- Allotment of Qtr. No.C-6, Type-III, Timarpur DTL Colony,
            Delhi
  Sir,
       Reference your letter No.ND.AND/6-03/26 dated 30-9-05
  regarding allotment of quarter No.C-6, Type-III, DTL Colony
  Timarpur, Delhi to Sh. Sanjay Chibber, E. No.33402, AG.III of NDPL
  in lieu quarter No.7, Type-III, NDPL Colony, Narela, Delhi.
      The competent authority has approved the transfer of Qtr. No.C-6,
  DTL Colony, Timarpur for further allotment to Sh. Sanjay Chibber,
  AG.III, 33402 provided NDPL transfers Qtr. No.7, Type-III, NDPL
  Colony Narela to DTL. Other terms and conditions in this regard will
  be communicated separately.
                                                 Sd/-
                                            (SUDERSHAN KUMAR)
                                            Dy. Manager (Admn) I
  Copy to:-
  1. Asstt. Manager (Billing) Transco: For information and necessary
  action please.
  2. Manager (T) Civil-II: For information please
  3. Sectional Head alongwith a separate copy. He is requested to
  obtain dated acknowledgment of Sh. Sanjay Chibber, 33402, AG.III,
  Model Town
WP(C) 3511/2014                                                   Page 2 of 3
         Through DGM (A) NDPL
                                                         Sd/-
                                              Dy. Manager (Admn.)I"

2.           Counsel for the respondents though tried to put up some sort of

argument in defence to justify the date of 16.2.2006, however, the argument

is totally shallow and without any substance inasmuch as once by the letter

dated    28.12.2005     there    was     an   allotment   of    the      subject

accommodation/quarter in favour of Sh. Sanjay Chibber, thereafter it cannot

be said that there is any illegal or unauthorized accommodation by the

petitioner of the quarter in question.

3.           Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed to the limited extent,

as prayed for, that the period of recovery will not be from 1.10.2004 to

16.2.2006 but will only be for the period from 1.10.2004 to 28.12.2005.




FEBRUARY 19, 2015                               VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

Ne

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter