Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 1356 Del
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY APPLICATION (MAIN) NO. 14/2015
Reserved on 29th January, 2015
Date of pronouncement: 13th February, 2015
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Application under Sections 391 & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
M/s. Ganraj Sugars Private Limited
Applicant/Transferor Company No. 1
M/s. Pukhraj Sugars Private Limited
Applicant/Transferor Company No. 2
M/s. Jivitesh Sugars Private Limited
Applicant/Transferor Company No. 3
M/s. Parashar Sugars Private Limited
Applicant/Transferor Company No. 4
M/s. Ritesh Vyapaar Private Limited
Applicant/Transferor Company No. 5
M/s. Hindon Projects Private Limited
Applicant/Transferor Company No. 6
WITH
M/s. Ojas Industries Private Limited
Applicant/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Alok Krishna Agarwal,
Mr.Sanjeev Singh, Mr. Upendra Prasad
and Mr. Mayank Bugani, Advocates for
the applicants
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This joint application has been filed under Sections 391 & 394 of
the Companies Act, 1956 by the applicant companies seeking directions
of this court to dispense with the requirement of convening the meetings
of their equity shareholders, preference shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors to consider and approve, with or without
modification, the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation of M/s. Ganraj
Sugars Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company
no. 1); M/s. Pukhraj Sugars Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the
transferor company no. 2); M/s. Jivitesh Sugars Private Limited
(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 3); M/s. Parashar
Sugars Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company
no. 4); M/s. Ritesh Vyapaar Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the
transferor company no. 5) and M/s. Hindon Projects Private Limited
(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 6) with M/s. Ojas
Industries Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee
company).
2. The matter was heard and reserved on 29th January, 2015.
3. On an examination of the application, it is noticed that the share
exchange ratio as mentioned in the application is adopted from the
Valuation Report dated 16th August, 2014 furnished by M/s. P. K. Katyal
& Co., Chartered Accountants (page 209, Annexure II). Unfortunately,
the applicants adopted the same without maintaining a common
sequence in the Memo of Parties. Consequently, the second share
exchange ratio mentioned for Jivitesh Sugars Private Limited (JSPL) in
the valuation report is applicable to the third applicant/transferor
company no. 3; the third share exchange ratio mentioned for Ritesh
Vyapaar Private Limited (RVPL) in the valuation report is applicable for
fifth applicant/transferor company no. 5; the fourth share exchange ratio
mentioned for Pukhraj Sugars Private Limited (PSPL) in the valuation
report is applicable for second applicant/transferor company no. 2; and
the fifth share exchange ratio mentioned for Parashar Sugars Private
Limited (PRSPL) in the valuation report is applicable for fourth
applicant/transferor company no. 4.
4. Furthermore, the fourth share exchange ratio mentioned in the
valuation report has wrongly been stated in the Scheme. The said share
exchange ratio is for Pukhraj Sugars Private Limited (PSPL). It provides
that for every 514 shares of PSPL, the shareholders shall be entitled to
receive 100 shares of the transferee company. However, the applicants
have wrongly adopted the said share exchange ratio for Parashar Sugars
Private Limited (PRSPL), and while stating the said exchange ratio in the
Scheme and the application, they have wrongly mentioned that for every
514 fully paid-up equity shares of PRSPL, the shareholders are entitled
to receive only 01 fully paid-up equity share of the transferee company.
5. Even though the transferor companies are wholly owned
subsidiaries of the transferee company, which is the ultimate beneficiary
of this Scheme, but that does not entitle the applicants to present
incorrect facts in the application. The application has been drafted in a
very casual manner and needs a thorough relook.
6. Learned counsel for the applicants is directed to file an affidavit
clarifying the aforesaid discrepancies, within two weeks.
7. Re-notify the matter on 26th February, 2015.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
February 13, 2015
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!