Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 1049 Del
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2015
$~14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 4th February, 2015
+ MAC.APP. 694/2013
ROSHNI DEVI & ORS ..... Appellants
Through: Mr. Manu Shahalia, Adv.
versus
TAKDEER SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. with
Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs.5,65,682/-
awarded for the death of Mahabir Singh, who died in a motor
vehicular accident which occurred on 11.08.2010.
2. During inquiry before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the
Claims Tribunal), it was claimed that deceased Mahabir Singh was a
retired Naib Subedar from Army. He was getting a pension of
Rs.13,845/- per month and was carrying on business under the name
and style of 'Dalal Khad Beej Bhandar' dealing in seeds and building
material. It was also claimed that the deceased was a matriculate.
3. There were seven Petitioners including three married daughters. The
Claims Tribunal took minimum wages of a Matriculate, deducted 1/5 th
towards personal and living expenses and applied the multiplier of 9
(as per the age of the deceased as 57 years) to compute the loss of
dependency as Rs.5,10,681/-.
4. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellants that no
compensation was awarded towards deduction in pension in as much
as the pension was reduced from Rs.13,845/- to Rs.8,412/-. It is stated
that the compensation awarded towards non-pecuniary damages is also
on the lower side. The potential income was also assessed on the
lower side.
5. It was admitted by PW-3 Anil Kumar son of the deceased Mahabir
Singh that the deceased was not assessed to income tax. Therefore,
the Claims Tribunal rightly took the minimum wages of the
Matriculate, i.e. Rs.6448/- per month to compute the loss of
dependency because any income beyond Rs.1,80,000/- at the relevant
time was subject to income tax. It is established from the certificate
Ex.PW-3/10 issued by the Punjab National Bank that during his
lifetime, the deceased was getting a pension of Rs.13,845/- per month
and after his death, the family pension got reduced to Rs.8,412/-. This
was the real loss to the widow and the dependants. Therefore, the
compensation towards loss of dependency ought to have been awarded
for loss of pension of Rs.5433/- per month as well.
6. At the same time, the three daughters, Appellants no.5 to 7 being
married, they were not dependent upon the deceased Mahabir Singh.
Further, although, Appellants no.2 and 3 were major, but even major
sons remain dependent upon the parents till they settle in their life.
Thus, deduction towards personal and living expenses ought to have
been 1/4th instead of 1/5th as made by the Claims Tribunal.
7. The loss of dependency thus, comes to Rs.9,62,361/- (6448/- + 5433/-
x 12 x 3/4 x 9).
8. In addition, the Appellants are entitled to a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each
towards loss of love and affection and loss of consortium; Rs.25,000/-
towards funeral expenses and Rs.10,000/- towards loss to estate.
9. The compensation awarded is re-computed as under:-
Sl. Compensation under various heads Awarded by this Court No.
1. Loss of Dependency 9,62,361/-
2. Loss of Love and Affection 1,00,000/-
3. Loss of Consortium 1,00,000/-
4. Funeral Expenses 25,000/-
5. Loss to Estate 10,000/-
Total Rs.11,97,361/-
10. The enhanced compensation of Rs.6,31,679/- shall carry interest at the
rate of 7.5% per annum.
11. 15% of the awarded compensation along with proportionate interest
shall enure for the benefit of Appellants no.2 and 3 and 20% along
with proportionate interest for the benefit of Appellant no.4. Rest
50% shall go to Appellant no.1.
12. 60% of the enhanced compensation awarded to each of the four
Appellants shall be held in Fixed Deposit for a period of two years.
Rest shall be released on deposit.
13. The enhanced compensation along with proportionate interest shall be
deposited with the Claims Tribunal within a period of six weeks from
today, failing which the Appellants shall be entitled to interest @ 12%
per annum from the date of this judgment.
14. The appeal is allowed in above terms.
15. Pending application also stands disposed of.
(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE FEBRUARY 04, 2015 vk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!