Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chetan Arora & Anr vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr
2015 Latest Caselaw 9597 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 9597 Del
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2015

Delhi High Court
Chetan Arora & Anr vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 23 December, 2015
#12
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                 Date of decision: 23.12.2015

W.P.(CRL) 3085/2015

CHETAN ARORA & ANR                                 ..... Petitioners
                Through:                Mr. Amulya Dhingra, Advocate

                           versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR                ..... Respondents

Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC (Criminal) with SI Alok Kumar, PS- Sarai Rohilla for R-1 Mr. Vinay Kumar Bhasin, Advocate for R-2 CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

CRL.M.A.18915/2015 (Exemption)

Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

W.P.(CRL) 3085/2015

1. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.)

seeking quashing of FIR No.905/2014, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC,

registered at Police Station- Sarai Rohilla and the proceedings arising

therefrom.

2. The facts in brief are that on 11.06.2011 the petitioner No.1 married

respondent No.2 according to Hindu customs and ceremonies in Delhi. No

child was born out of the said wedlock. Owing to ideological and

temperamental differences the parties to the marriage have been living

separately since 13.10.2013. On a complaint filed by the respondent No.2

(wife) against her husband (petitioner No.1) and his mother, the subject FIR

was registered.

3. Eventually better sense prevailed and the parties decided to settle all

their matrimonial disputes with the assistance of Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis

Hazari Courts, Delhi. The settlement agreement dated 16.04.2015 is

annexed to this petition as Annexure P-3. The salient terms and conditions

of the said settlement agreement dated 16.04.2015 are as follows:-

"1) It is mutually settled between the parties that petitioner and respondent No.1 shall dissolve their marriage by decree of divorce by mutual consent without leveling allegations and counter-allegations against each other in accordance with law before the Court of competent jurisdiction.

2) It is settled that Sh. Chetan Arora, respondent No.1 shall pay Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs only) along with the

articles as per the admitted list by both the parties to the petitioner, as full and final settlement of the petitioner including all claims of the petitioner past, present and future arising out of the marriage with accused which shall include permanent alimony, maintenance and all other miscellaneous expenses.

3) The settled amount of Rs.20,00,000/- shall be paid in four installments by respondent No.1 to the petitioner as follows:-

i) First installment of Rs.1,00,000/- shall be paid today itself by way of cheque bearing No.000664 dated 16.04.2015 drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, Vishal Enclave, Najafgarh Road, Delhi.

ii) Second installment of Rs.9,00,000/-

shall be paid at the time of recording statements in First Motion Petition U/s 13(B)(1) of Hindu Marriage Act which shall be filed afresh by the parties jointly on or before 15.05.2015.

iii) Third installment of Rs.5,00,000/- at the time of recording statements in Second Motion Petition U/s 13(B)(2) of Hindu Marriage Act which shall be filed by the parties jointly within one month after the expiry of stipulated period of six months.

iv) Fourth installment of Rs.5,00,000/-

shall be paid at the time of recording statements in petition for quashing of FIR No.905/14 PS: Sarai Rohilla, U/s 406/498A/34 IPC State vs. Chetan Arora & Ors., which shall be moved

forthwith before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi within one month after Second Motion. The petitioner shall cooperate in quashing of the said FIR.

4. It is agreed that the petitioner shall withdraw the present petition u/s 12 of D.V. Act from the referral court on or before 15.05.2015 and at that time the respondent No.1 shall return the articles as per the admitted list by both the parties, annexed herewith as 'Annexure-A'.

5. It is settled that the respondent No.1 Chetan Arora shall withdraw the divorce petition titled as Chetan Arora vs. Sakshi Bhalla and petitioner Sakshi Bhalla shall withdraw petition u/s 18 of HMA, 1956 titled as Sakshi Bhalla vs. Chetan Arora, both pending in the Court of Sh. Dilbag Singh Punia, Judge, Family Court, Tis Hazxari Courts, Delhi on or before 15.05.2015.

6. It is settled that there shall remain no case/claim/dispute due between the parties after compliance of the terms of the present settlement and that none of the parties shall file any civil or criminal proceedings against each other in future and that if any other case/petition/complaint etc. between the parties is pending in any Court or Authority either against the parties or against their respective family members and whether it is in the knowledge of other party or not, the same shall be withdrawn/got disposed of by the respective party.

7. The parties entered into the present Settlement/Agreement out of their own free will and consent, without any fear, coercion

or undue influence from any corner, whatsoever.

8. The parties shall be bound by this settlement and shall co-operate to execute this settlement in every possible manner, whatsoever."

4. In a nutshell it has been agreed by and between the parties that Anuj

Jain shall pay a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- to Sakshi Bhalla as full and final

settlement against stridhan, dowry articles, present, past, future maintenance

and permanent alimony etc. In pursuance to the aforesaid settlement, a sum

of Rs.15,00,000/- has already been received by the complainant. The

balance sum of Rs.5,00,000/- has been brought to the Court in the shape of a

Demand Draft bearing No.914640 dated 16.12.2015 drawn on Kotak

Mahindra Bank, Lower Parel, Mumbai, Delhi. The same is handed over to

the complainant in Court today who acknowledges receipt thereof subject to

its realization.

5. Sakshi Bhalla, respondent No.2/complainant, who is present in Court

and has been duly identified by IO SI Alok Kumar, Police Station- Sarai

Rohilla, Delhi states that in view of the settlement arrived at between the

parties, she is no longer keen to proceed with the subject FIR and the

proceedings arising therefrom.

6. In view of the foregoing, since the dispute which resulted in the

registration of the subject FIR has already been resolved amicably by the

parties without any undue influence, pressure or coercion, no useful purpose

will be served by proceeding with the subject FIR and the proceedings

arising therefrom.

7. Consequently, FIR No.905/2014, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC,

registered at Police Station- Sarai Rohilla and the proceedings arising

therefrom are hereby set aside and quashed qua both the petitioners subject

to their depositing a sum of Rs.10,000/- each with the Delhi High Court

Legal Services Committee within a period of two weeks from today. The

receipt of the said deposit shall be furnished to the concerned IO.

8. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J

DECEMBER 23, 2015 dn

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter