Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 9586 Del
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY APPLICATION (MAIN) NO. 189/2015
Reserved on 18th December, 2015
Date of pronouncement: 23rd December, 2015
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Application under Sections 391, 392 & 394 of
the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 6 &
9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959
Scheme of Arrangement between:
Lloyds Line Pipes Limited
Applicant/Transferor Company
AND
APL Apollo Tubes Limited
Non-Applicant/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Ashutosh Gupta,
Advocate for the applicants
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This application has been filed under Sections 391, 392 & 394 of
the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 6 & 9 of the Companies
(Court) Rules, 1959 by the applicant/transferor company seeking
directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of convening the
meetings of its equity shareholders and secured creditors and for
convening a meeting of its unsecured creditors to consider and approve,
with or without modification, the proposed Scheme of Arrangement
between Lloyds Line Pipes Limited (hereinafter referred to as the
transferor company) and APL Apollo Tubes Limited (hereinafter referred
to as the transferee company.
2. The registered offices of the applicant/transferor company and the
transferee company are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of
this Court.
3. The applicant/transferor company was originally incorporated
under the Companies Act, 1956 on 4th September, 2008 with the
Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra at Mumbai. The company shifted
its registered office from the State of Maharashtra to Delhi and obtained
a certificate in this regard from the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi
& Haryana at New Delhi 26th August, 2011.
4. The present authorized share capital of the applicant/transferor
company is Rs.20,00,00,000/- divided into 2,00,00,000 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the
company is Rs.20,00,00,000/- divided into 2,00,00,000 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each.
5. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record. The
audited balance sheet, as on 31st March, 2015, along with the report of
the auditors, of the applicant/transferor company has also been filed.
6. A copy of the Scheme of Arrangement has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the application and the accompanying affidavit. It is submitted
by the applicant that the transferor company is a wholly owned subsidiary
of the transferee company. It is claimed that the proposed amalgamation
will contribute in furthering and fulfilling the objectives and business
strategies of both the companies thereby accelerating growth, expansion
and development of their business. It is further claimed that the proposed
amalgamation will lead to optimum and efficient utilization of capital,
resources, assets and facilities; enhancement of competitive strengths
including financial resources; and will result in reduction of overheads,
administrative, managerial and other expenditure and bring about
operational rationalization, efficiency and optimum utilization of various
resources.
7. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that the entire share capital of the transferor company is held by
the transferee company. Therefore, the transferee company shall not be
required to issue any shares or pay any consideration to the transferor
company or to their shareholders.
8. It has been submitted by the applicant that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 and corresponding
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 are pending against the applicant/
transferor company.
9. The Board of Directors of the applicant/transferor company and the
transferee company in their separate meetings held on 13th June, 2015
have unanimously approved the proposed Scheme of Arrangement.
Copies of the Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of
Directors of the applicant/transferor company and the transferee
company have been placed on record.
10. The applicant/transferor company has 07 equity shareholders and
02 secured creditors. All the equity shareholders and both the secured
creditors have given their consents/no objections in writing to the
proposed Scheme of Arrangement. Their consents/no objections have
been placed on record. They have been examined and found in order. In
view thereof, the requirement of convening the meetings of the equity
shareholders and secured creditors of the applicant/transferor company
to consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the
proposed Scheme of Arrangement is dispensed with.
11. The applicant/transferor company has 126 unsecured creditors and
a direction is sought to convene and hold their meeting to seek their
approval to the proposed Scheme of Arrangement. Considering the facts
and circumstances aforesaid, the meeting of the unsecured creditors of
the applicant/transferor company shall be held on 13th February, 2016 at
01:00 p.m. at J.P. Hotels and Resorts, 6-B, I.P. Extension, Patparganj,
Delhi. Mr. Shobhit Kumar Mahant, Advocate, (Mobile No. 9810357786) is
appointed as the Chairperson and Mr. Mudit Gupta, Advocate, (Mobile
No. 9910687976) is appointed as the Alternate Chairperson to conduct
the said meeting. The Quorum of the meeting of the unsecured creditors
of the applicant/ transferor company shall be 25 in number and more than
25% in value of the total unsecured debt.
12. In case the quorum as noted above for the above meeting is not
present at the meeting, then the meeting shall be adjourned by half an
hour, and thereafter the persons present and voting shall be deemed to
constitute the quorum. For the purpose of computing the quorum the
valid proxies shall also be considered, if the proxy in the prescribed form
duly signed by the person entitled to attend and vote at the meeting is
filed with the registered office of the applicant/transferor company at least
48 hours before the meeting. The Chairperson and Alternate Chairperson
shall ensure that the proxy register is properly maintained.
13. The Chairperson and Alternate Chairperson shall ensure that
notices for convening the aforesaid meeting of the unsecured creditors of
the applicant/transferor company, along with copies of the Scheme of
Arrangement and the statement under Section 393 of the Companies
Act, 1956, shall be sent to the unsecured creditors of the applicant/
transferor company by ordinary post at their registered or last known
addresses at least 21 days before the date appointed for the meeting, in
their presence or in the presence of their authorized representatives.
Notice of the meeting shall also be published in the Delhi editions of the
newspapers "Business Standard" (English) and (Hindi) in terms of the
Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 at least 21 days before the date
appointed for the meeting.
14. The Chairperson and Alternate Chairperson will be at liberty to
issue suitable directions to the management of the applicant company so
that the aforesaid meeting of the unsecured creditors of the applicant/
transferor company is conducted in a just, free and fair manner.
15. The fee of the Chairperson and the Alternate Chairperson for the
aforesaid meeting shall be Rs.50,000/- each in addition to meeting their
incidental expenses. The Chairperson will file his report within two weeks
from the date of holding of the aforesaid meeting.
16. The applicant also seeks dispensation of requirement of the
transferee company to approach this Court for sanction of Scheme of
Amalgamation under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 on
the ground that the Scheme does not entail or involve any arrangement
between the transferee company and its shareholders since the
transferor company is wholly owned subsidiary of the transferee
company; no new shares will be issued by the transferee company in lieu
of the shares of the transferor company; and there will be no change in
the control and management of the transferee company, therefore, the
rights of the shareholders and creditors of the transferee company will
not be affected in any manner whatsoever by the Scheme. Learned
counsel also placed reliance on the judgments of this Court, in many
cases such as Sharat Hardware Industries Pvt. Ltd. (1978), 48 Com.
Cas 23 (Delhi); eMeter India Pvt. Ltd. (CA(M) 179/2012); Century
Seeds Private Ltd. (CA(M) 36/2015); Jaisingh Wires Private Limited
(CA(M) 138/2015); Sudeep Import Export Private Limited (CA(M)
149/2015); and Bharti Infotel Private Limited (CA(M) 152/2015),
wherein it has been held that there is no requirement to file a separate or
joint application on behalf of the transferee company for sanction of the
Scheme.
17. I have carefully considered the aforesaid case laws cited at the
Bar, wherein the transferee company, being the holding company, has
been granted exemption from taking out separate proceedings under
Section 391(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. In view of this settled legal
position and considering the Scheme, the requirement of the transferee
company having to approach this Court under Section 391(2) of the
Companies Act, 1956 for sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation is
dispensed with.
18. The application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.
Dasti
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
December 23, 2015
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!