Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 9576 Del
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 380/2015
Reserved on 10th December, 2015
Date of pronouncement: 23rd December, 2015
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391, 392 & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
Signatureglobal Resources Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company
WITH
Signatureglobal (India) Private Limited
Non-Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Rishi Sood and
Mr.Ashutosh Gupta, Advocates for the
petitioners
Mr. Sanjay Bose, Dy. Registrar of
Companies for the Regional Director
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
Official Liquidator
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This petition has been filed under Sections 391, 392 & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner/transferor company seeking
sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Signatureglobal Resources
Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner/transferor
company) with Signatureglobal (India) Private Limited (hereinafter
referred to as the transferee company).
2. The registered offices of the petitioner/transferor company and the
transferee company are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of
this Court.
3. The petitioner/transferor company was originally incorporated
under the Companies Act, 1956 on 15th February, 1995 with the
Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the
name and style of Zee Dataline Private Limited. The company changed
its name to Signatureglobal Resources Private Limited and obtained the
fresh certificate of incorporation on 11th September, 2014.
4. The present authorized share capital of the petitioner/transferor
company is Rs.3,70,00,000/- divided into 37,00,000 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the
company is Rs.3,68,50,000/- divided into 36,85,000 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each.
5. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
petitioner/transferor company and the transferee company have been
filed on record. The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of
petitioner/transferor company and the transferee company, along with the
report of the auditors, have also been filed.
6. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is submitted by
the petitioner that the transferor company is a wholly owned subsidiary of
the transferee company. It is claimed that the proposed amalgamation
will result in establishment of a larger company with larger resources, a
larger capital base and a greater capacity to raise funds for expansion,
modernization and development of the businesses of the companies
concerned. It is further claimed that the Scheme will result in economies
of scale, reduction in overheads and other expenses, reduction in
administrative and procedure work, and better and more productive
utilization of various resources.
7. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that the transferor company is a wholly owned subsidiary of the
transferee company, and the entire equity share capital of the transferor
company is held by the transferee company. Therefore, the transferee
company shall not be required to issue any shares to the shareholders of
the transferor company and the shares so held by the transferee
company shall stand cancelled.
8. It has been submitted by the petitioner that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the
transferor and transferee companies.
9. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 2nd January, 2015 and 14th January,
2015 respectively have unanimously approved the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation. Copies of the Resolutions passed at the meetings of the
Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies have been
placed on record.
10. The petitioner/transferor company had earlier filed CA (M) No.
56/2015 seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement
of convening the meetings of its equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 14th May, 2015, this court
allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening
and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders and unsecured
creditors of the petitioner/transferor company, there being no secured
creditor of the petitioner/transferor company, to consider and, if thought
fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation. Vide the said order, this Court also dispensed with the
requirement of the filing a separate petition by the transferee company.
11. The petitioner/transferor company has thereafter filed the present
petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order
dated 1st July, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the
Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in 'Statesman' (English) and 'Veer
Arjun' (Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the petitioner
showing compliance regarding service on the Official Liquidator and the
Regional Director, Northern Region and also regarding publication of
citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 20th October, 2015. Copies of
the newspaper clippings containing the publications have been filed
along with the said affidavit.
12. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner company. Based on the information
received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 23rd November,
2015 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party
interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the
transferor company do not appear to have been conducted in a manner
prejudicial to the interest of its members, creditors or public interest, as
per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
13. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 26th November, 2015. Relying on Clause
9.1 of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the Scheme of
Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor company shall
become the employees of the transferee company without any break or
interruption in their services. He has further submitted that in Clause
15.1.1 of the Scheme, it has been stated that upon the Scheme
becoming effective, the transferee company shall follow the method of
accounting as prescribed for Purchase Method under Accounting
Standard-14 as notified under Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules,
2006. He further submitted that in Clause 17.1 of the Scheme, it has
been stated that upon this scheme becoming effective, the transferor
company shall stand dissolved without the process of winding up.
14. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner company in the affidavit dated 24th
November, 2015 of Mr. Ravi Aggarwal, Director of the transferor
company, has submitted that the petitioner has not received any
objection pursuant to the citations published in the newspapers on 20th
October, 2015.
15. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders and
creditors of the petitioner company to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation; and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern
Region, and the Official Liquidator not raising any objection to the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment
to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,
sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under
Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner
company will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with
law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies
within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as
an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in
accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the
appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 31st March, 2015, the transferor
company shall stand dissolved without undergoing the process of winding
up.
16. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at
least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioner keeping in view the
fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and
also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner company
states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order
dated 10.12.2015, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by
way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.
17. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
December 23, 2015
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!