Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Union Of India vs M/S Elnet Technologies Ltd. & Anr
2015 Latest Caselaw 9510 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 9510 Del
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2015

Delhi High Court
Union Of India vs M/S Elnet Technologies Ltd. & Anr on 21 December, 2015
Author: Manmohan Singh
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                          Order Pronounced on: 21st December, 2015

+                    R.P. No.191/2013 in O.M.P. No.417/2005

       UNION OF INDIA                                 ..... Petitioner
                         Through   Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC

                         versus

       M/S ELNET TECHNOLOGIES LTD. & ANR      ..... Respondents
                      Through  Mr.K.S.Mahadevan, Adv.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH

MANMOHAN SINGH, J.

1. The present review petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 114 read with Section 151 CPC for recalling of the final judgment passed by this Court on 6th February, 2013.

2. Admittedly, the impugned judgment was passed on merits. It is also the admitted position that the counsel who appeared on behalf of the petitioner at that time, was unable to argue the matter, thus the Court had no other option but to pass the order on merits.

3. Learned counsel for the review-petitioner has stated that the review petition is maintainable against the dismissal of the objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. He has also admitted that no appeal against the impugned judgment has been preferred by the petitioner.

4. The only ground mentioned in the review petition is that the counsel who appeared at that time could not provide the effective assistance to the Court as he was under the bonafide impression that the matter was listed for limited purposes. In any case, at the time of

hearing of the review petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the fact that the matter has been decided on merits. I am of the considered view that the ground raised in the application, which is the subject matter of the review, does not call for recalling of the impugned judgment.

5. The review petition is accordingly dismissed.

(MANMOHAN SINGH) JUDGE DECEMBER 21, 2015

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter