Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harveer Singh & Ors vs State & Anr
2015 Latest Caselaw 6397 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 6397 Del
Judgement Date : 28 August, 2015

Delhi High Court
Harveer Singh & Ors vs State & Anr on 28 August, 2015
Author: Siddharth Mridul
#35
*        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                   Date of decision: 28.08.2015


+        W.P.(CRL) 1873/2015

         HARVEER SINGH & ORS                         ..... Petitioners
                      Through              Mr. Amar Nath Saini, Advocate

                                 versus

         STATE & ANR                                   ..... Respondents

Through Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC (Crl.) SI Anita Sharma, P.S. Keshav Puram

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

Crl. MA No. 12553/2015 (Exemption)

1. Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 1873/2015

1. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

read with Section 482 Cr.P.C, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 315/2014

under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station- Keshav Puram,

Delhi and the proceedings arising therefrom.

2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner No.1 was married to

respondent No.2 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 4th February,

2013 at Delhi. However, no child was born from the said wedlock. After the

marriage, the parties lived together as husband and wife in their matrimonial

home but owing to temperamental and ideological differences, they

separated from each other and started living separately. On a complaint

instituted by respondent No.2, the subject FIR was registered against the

petitioner no. 1 and his family members.

3. Counsel for the parties state that with the intervention of elders in the

family and friends, the parties to the union have arrived at an amicable

resolution of their outstanding marital disputes. The terms and conditions of

the aforesaid settlement dated 20th June, 2014 are extracted in the present

petition in paragraph 5. The same are as follows:-

"1. That the petitioner no. 1 and the respondent no. 2 shall seek divorce by way of mutual consent for dissolution of marriage which has already taken place in the present case vide judgment dated 04.04.2015.

2. That out of the settlement amount of Rs. 7,00,000/-, Rs. 2,33,333/- was agreed to pay at the time of first motion, Rs. 2,33,333/- at the time of making statement at the time of second motion under Section 13B(2) HMA, 1955 and Rs. 2,33,333/- before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at the

time of quashing of the FIR bearing no. 315/2014 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Keshav Puram. Whereas now only Rs. 2,33,333/- remains to be paid before the Hon'ble High Court as divorce has already taken place and Rs. 4,66,666/- has already been paid to the respondent no. 2 by the petitioner no. 1."

4. Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties state that in pursuance to

the said Settlement Agreement dated 20th June, 2014, a decree of divorce by

mutual consent has already been obtained from the competent Court.

5. In a nutshell, it has been agreed by and between the parties to the

union that respondent no. 2/wife shall be paid a lump-sum of Rs. 7 lakhs

towards all her claims against the petitioners.

6. Respondent No.2/wife, who is present in Court and has been identified

by her counsel as well as the Investigating Officer i.e. SI Anita, Police

Station- Keshav Puram, Delhi, states in pursuance to the settlement, she

has already received two installments in the sum of Rs. 2,33,333/- each from

the petitioners.

7. The balance sum of Rs. 2,33,333 lakhs has been handed over to

respondent No.2 by way of a Demand Draft dated 27th August, 2015 bearing

No. 501225 drawn on the ICICI Bank, Connaught Place, New Delhi in

favour of the respondent no. 2, in Court today. Respondent No.2

acknowledges receipt thereof subject to its encashment.

8. Respondent No.2/wife further states that in view of the settlement

arrived at between the parties, she is no longer keen to proceed with the

subject FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

9. Since the dispute between the parties, which arose out of a

matrimonial discord between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2, has been

settled amicably by way of a Settlement Agreement dated 20th June, 2014,

without any undue influence, pressure or coercion; and since the agreement

between the parties is lawful, no useful purpose will be served by proceeding

with the subject FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom.

10. Resultantly, the FIR No. 315/2014 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC

registered at Police Station- Keshav Puram, Delhi and the proceedings

arising therefrom are hereby set aside and quashed qua all the petitioners

subject to the petitioners depositing a sum of Rs. 10,000/- each with the

Mother Teresa's Missionaries of Charity, Jeevan Jyoti Home, Opp. Sai

Hospital, Jangpura-B, Mathura Road, New Delhi-14, within a period of two

weeks from today. Receipt thereof shall be provided to the Investigating

Officer in the subject FIR.

11. With the above directions, the writ petition is allowed and disposed of

accordingly.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J

AUGUST 28, 2015/sd

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter