Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 6288 Del
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2015
$~18.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 1718/2015 and I.As.No.12112-13/2015
NEELAM GIRDHAR ..... Plaintiff
Through: None
versus
RAVI KUMAR & ORS. ..... Defendants
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 25.08.2015
1. The case was passed over on the first call as none was present
on behalf of the plaintiff. Same is the position even on the second
call.
2. A perusal of the order sheet shows that none had appeared for
the plaintiff on the last date of hearing. Nor has the office objection
with regard to the deficiency in the court fees been cured.
3. It appears that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the
present suit, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for
non-prosecution, along with the pending applications.
HIMA KOHLI, J AUGUST 25, 2015 mk/ap
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!