Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 6043 Del
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 236/2014
Reserved on 10th July, 2015
Date of pronouncement: 18th August, 2015
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
INC Research CDS Services Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1
Trident Clinical Research India Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2
WITH
Kendle India Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Mohit Chadha and
Mr.Ishwar, Advocate for the petitioners
Ms. Aparna Mudiam, AROC for the
Regional Director
Mr. Kanwal Choudhary, Advocate for
the Official Liquidator
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of
the Scheme of Amalgamation of INC Research CDS Services Private
Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 1) and
Trident Clinical Research India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as
the transferor company no. 2) with Kendle India Private Limited
(hereinafter referred to as the transferee company).
2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies
are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this court.
3. The transferor company no. 1 was originally incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 21st May, 2007 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and
style of INC GVK Bio Private Limited. The company changed its name to
INC Research CDS Services Private Limited and obtained the fresh
certificate of incorporation on 13th March, 2012.
4. The transferor company no. 2 was originally incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 12th September, 2006 with the Registrar of
Companies, Maharashtra at Mumbai. Thereafter, the company shifted its
registered office from the State of Maharashtra to Delhi and obtained a
certificate in this regard from the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi &
Haryana at New Delhi on 9th January, 2013.
5. The transferee company was incorporated under the Companies
Act, 1956 on 16th December, 2004 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT
of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
6. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.1 is Rs.2,00,00,000/- each divided into 20,00,000 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the
companies are Rs.1,49,60,000/- each divided into 14,96,000 equity
shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid-up.
7. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.2 is Rs.10,00,000/- each divided into 1,00,000 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the
companies are Rs.7,21,800/- each divided into 72,180 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each fully paid-up.
8. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is
Rs.10,00,000/- each divided into 1,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the companies are
Rs.10,00,000/- each divided into 1,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
9. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record. The
audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2013, of the transferor and
transferee companies, along with the report of the auditors, have also
been filed.
10. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed by
the petitioners that the amalgamation would result in elimination of the
overhead outstanding and other expenses and it will ensure optimum
utilization of available services and resources. It is further claimed that
the amalgamation will enable pooling of resources of both the companies
to their common advantage, resulting in more productive utilization of the
said resources, cost & operational efficiencies which would be beneficial
for all stakeholders.
11. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee
company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the
transferor companies in the following ratio:
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each fully paid up of the transferee company for every 65 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up held in the transferor company no. 1."
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each fully paid up of the transferee company for every 10 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up held in the transferor company no. 2."
12. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 250A of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against
the transferor and transferee companies.
13. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 3rd January, 2014 have unanimously
approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the
Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the
transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.
14. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 55/2014
seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of
convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 26th March, 2014, this court
allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening
and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders and unsecured
creditors of the transferor and transferee companies, there being no
secured creditors of the petitioner companies, to consider and, if thought
fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation.
15. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition
seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 21st
April, 2014, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the
Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in 'Financial Express' (English) and
„Dainik Jagran‟ (Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the
petitioner showing compliance regarding service on the Official Liquidator
and the Regional Director, Northern Region and also regarding
publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 1st May, 2014.
Copies of the newspaper clippings containing the publications have been
filed along with the said affidavit.
16. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information
received, the Dy. Official Liquidator has filed a report wherein he has
stated that he has not received any complaint against the proposed
Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party interested in the
Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the transferor companies
do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the
interest of their members, creditors or public interest, as per second
proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
17. The Dy. Official Liquidator in Para 17 of his report has submitted
that the appointed date, as mentioned in the Scheme, is 01.04.2013
whereas in Para 17.A of the petition, it has been mentioned as
01.04.2012. He, therefore, prays that a clarification may be sought from
the petitioners in this regard. In response to the aforesaid observation,
learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that due to
typographical error, the appointed date has wrongly been mentioned in
the petition as 01.04.2012 and the same may be read as 01.04.2013. In
view of the aforesaid, the observation raised by the Official Liquidator
stands satisfied.
18. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 5th September, 2014. Relying on Clause
7.1 of Part-II of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor companies
shall become the employees of the transferee company, without any
break or interruption in their services.
19. Although the Regional Director in his report has not raised any
objection to the proposed Scheme, but he has raised certain
observations in paras 4, 5, 6 & 8 of his report. In para 4 of his report he
has stated that the as per the Scheme of Amalgamation, there is no
mention regarding compliance procedure under Accounting Standard-14
as prescribed under the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006.
In para 5 & 6 of his report he has stated that the authorized share capital
of the transferee company is not sufficient to allot shares to the transferor
companies, therefore, the transferee company may be advised to comply
with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 with regard to increase in
the authorized share capital and change in its Memorandum of
Association. In para 8 of his report he has stated that the petitioner
company may be advised to furnish the undertaking for necessary
compliances from the Reserve Bank of India as required under FEMA
with regard to the shares held by the foreigner/NRI. In reply to aforesaid,
the petitioner companies have filed an affidavit dated 7th April, 2015 of
Mr. Shabbir Rangwala, Director of the petitioner companies whereby the
transferee company has undertaken to comply with the procedures under
Accounting Standard-14 as prescribed under the Companies (Accounting
Standards) Rules, 2006 and has also undertaken to comply with all the
applicable compliances as required by the RBI under FEMA, if and when
they arise in respect of the foreign shareholding. Further, it is submitted
that as per the Scheme, the authorized share capital of the transferor
companies shall stand merged in the authorized share capital of the
transferee company and furthermore, if required, the transferee company
shall take necessary steps to further increase and alter its authorized
share capital suitably. In view of the above, the observations raised by
the Regional Director stand satisfied.
20. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 7th
April, 2015 of Mr. Shabbir Rangwala, Director of the petitioner
companies, have submitted that neither the petitioner companies nor
their counsel have received any objection pursuant to the citations
published in the newspapers on 1st May, 2014.
21. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders and
creditors of the petitioner companies to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern
Region, and the Official Liquidator not raising any objection to the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment
to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,
sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under
Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner
companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with
law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies
within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as
an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in
accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the
appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2013, the transferor
companies nos. 1 & 2 shall stand dissolved without undergoing the
process of winding up.
22. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
August 18, 2015
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!