Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 3479 Del
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2015
$~18.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 890/2015
SUBHASH CHANDER CHOPRA ..... Plaintiff
Through None
versus
RADHEY SHAM ANAND & ORS. .... Defendants
Through None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 29.04.2015
1. The case was passed over on the first call, as none was present
on behalf of the plaintiff. Same is the position even on the second
call.
2. On 6.4.2015, counsel for the plaintiff was directed to address
arguments on the maintainability of the present suit, as it was noticed
that there is an arbitration clause governing the parties, contained in
the Agreement to Sell dated 23.12.2011. Counsel for the plaintiff had
also sought an adjournment to file copies of the legal notices issued by
the plaintiff to the defendants, apart from other relevant documents.
Compliance has not been made so far.
3. It appears that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the
present suit, which is accordingly dismissed in default as well as for
non-prosecution.
HIMA KOHLI, J APRIL 29, 2015/mk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!