Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harpal Singh & Anr. vs M/S. Icici Lombard & Anr.
2015 Latest Caselaw 3199 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 3199 Del
Judgement Date : 21 April, 2015

Delhi High Court
Harpal Singh & Anr. vs M/S. Icici Lombard & Anr. on 21 April, 2015
$~15
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                              Date of decision: 21st April, 2015
+        MAC.APP. 1071/2012

         HARPAL SINGH & ANR.                                ..... Appellants

                            Through:    Mr. S.N.Gupta, Adv.

                            versus

         M/S. ICICI LOMBARD & ANR.                          ..... Respondents

                            Through:    Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. with

                                        Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-1.


         CORAM:
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL


G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `12,35,000/-

awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims

Tribunal) in favour of the Appellants for the death of Jaspreet Singh,

who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which

occurred on 13.01.2010.

2. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellants that Jaspreet

Singh was a brilliant student who was pursuing B.Tech (Bachelor of

Technology) in Computer Science & Engineering from Guru Tegh

Bahadur Institute of Technology affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh

Indraprastha University. He had passed 12th class examination from a

prestigious school, i.e. Gyan Bharati School, Saket, New Delhi

affiliated to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). It is

stated that the Claims Tribunal assumed the potential income of the

deceased to be just `15,000/- per month, which is very low and needs

to be raised.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel for Respondent no.1 (M/s. ICICI

Lombard) states that the compensation awarded is just and reasonable.

4. It is no longer res integra that the potential income of a student who

suffers injuries in a motor vehicular accident must be considered for

awarding loss of dependency or loss of earning capacity.

5. In the case of Haji Zainullah Khan (Dead) by Lrs. v. Nagar

Mahapalika, Allahabad, 1994 (5) SCC 667, death of a young boy aged

20 years took place in an accident which happened in the year 1972.

The deceased was a student of B.Sc Ist year (Biology). Compensation

of `1,46,900/- was increased and rounded off to ` 1,50,000/-.

6. In Ganga Devi & Ors. v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Ors., MAC

APP. 359/2008, decided by this Court on 23.11.2009, which related to

the death of a student (studying medicine) who was doing internship

and was to be awarded the MBBS degree in a short time, the Tribunal

awarded compensation of ` 9,35,352/- on the basis of the minimum

wages of a Graduate. This Court observed that although the deceased

was getting a stipend of ` 5,000/- per month at the time of his death

due to the accident, he would have ultimately joined as a doctor at a

salary ranging between ` 16,000/- per month to ` 25,000/- per month.

Thus, the average monthly income of the deceased was taken as `

18,000/- per month and after adding 50% towards future prospects, the

compensation was enhanced to ` 21,36,000/-.

7. In Ramesh Chand Joshi v. New India Assurance Company, MAC

APP.212-213/2006 decided on 20.01.2010, this Court took the

potential income of a BE (Bio-Technology) First year student of Delhi

College of Engineer (DCE) to be `38,333/- per month.

8. A Division Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court in B.Ramulamma &

Ors. v. Venkatesh, Bus Union, Rep. by A.M. Velu Mudaliyar & Anr.,

2011 ACJ 1702 held that it was very difficult to determine the income

of a student if he was allowed to complete his course. It was observed

that it was appropriate and reasonable to take the salary at the entry

level fixed by the Govt. for such jobs.

9. There will always be a difference in the potential income of a student

pursuing professional course. There are prestigious colleges of

medicine like All India Institute of Medical Sciences and Maulana

Azad Medical College on the one hand and the colleges run by the

private universities on the other. Similarly, there are Indian Institute of

Technologies (IITs), Regional Engineering Colleges, Colleges

affiliated to State Universities and Private Colleges for Engineering

courses.

10. In the instant case, Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology

affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi can be

taken as a middle level College and University. Normally, the salary

of a Group A officer in the Central and State Government on the date

of accident is taken for awarding compensation in case of prestigious

and highly reputed colleges. Future prospects are also granted,

depending on the facts of the case. In the instant case, the Claims

Tribunal relied on the judgment in Oriental Insurance Company

Limited v. Urmila Devi and Ors., MAC APP.325/2011, decided on

19.04.2012 to assume the potential income of the deceased (Jaspreet

Singh) to be `15,000/- per month. In Urmila Devi (supra), the

deceased was pursuing MCA from Indira Gandhi National Open

University (IGNOU) by correspondence. Thus, the instant case could

not have been equated with the case of Urmila Devi (supra) as

Jaspreet Singh was doing B.Tech. from a middle level college and

University.

11. The salary of a Junior Engineer in the Government in January, 2010

inclusive of House Rent Allowance (HRA) was about `25,000/- per

month. The placement of a student coming out of such college was

also in the range of `3 lac to `3.5 lacs per annum. In view of this, I

tend to adopt the potential salary of the deceased to be `25,000/- per

month. If the component of HRA is treated as non-taxable, there

would be liability of income tax of about `5,000/- per annum.

12. The loss of dependency thus, comes to `20,65,000/- (25,000/- x 12 -

`5,000/- (income tax) x 1/2 x 14).

13. In view of the three Judge Bench decision of the Supreme Court in

Rajesh & Ors. v.Rajbir Singh & Ors., (2013) 9 SCC 54, the Appellants

are further entitled to a sum of `1,00,000/- towards loss of love

`25,000/- towards funeral expenses and `10,000/- towards loss to

estate.

14. The overall compensation hence, comes to `22,00,000/-.

15. Thus, the compensation is enhanced by `9,65,000/- which shall carry

interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim

Petition till its payment.

16. The enhanced compensation along with interest shall be deposited by

Respondent no.1 Insurance Company within a period of six weeks,

failing which the Appellants will be entitled to interest @ 12% per

annum from the date of this judgment.

17. The enhanced compensation along with interest shall be released/held

in fixed deposit in favour of the Appellants in terms of the order

passed by the Claims Tribunal.

18. The appeal is allowed in above terms.

19. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE APRIL 21, 2015 vk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter