Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 2719 Del
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2015
$-14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Decided on: 6th April, 2015
+ MAC.APP. 861/2012
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
..... Appellant
Through: Ms.Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate
versus
TRILOK SINGH @ TRILOKI & ORS
..... Respondents
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
JUDGMENT
G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The appeal is for reduction of compensation of
Rs.5,55,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
(the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondents no.1 and 2 for
the death of their 16 years old son Chaman Lal @ Canki who
suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which
occurred on 09.12.2009.
2. It is very unfortunate that the Appellant Insurance Company
preferred to approach this Court even on the award of paltry
compensation in a fatal accident case. It is admitted case of the
parties that the deceased was a student of 8th standard in Jeeven
Jyoti Public School. It was claimed that he was doing stitching
work in addition to his studies. Even if the factum of the
deceased doing stitching work is disbelieved, it is well settled
that in case of a student, potential income can be taken into
consideration to award loss of dependency and loss of earning
capacity. (See Meenu Tognatta & Anr. v. National Insurance
Company Limited, MAC APP.238/2012, decided on
20.04.2012).
3. Since deceased Chaman Lal @ Canki was a student of 8 th
standard and assuming that he belonged to poor strata of the
society, he would have at least completed his matriculation.
The minimum wages of a matriculate on the date of the accident
were Rs.4,382/- per month. On making deduction of 50%
towards personal and living expenses(in case of a bachelor) and
applying the multiplier of 14, the loss of dependency would
come to Rs.3,68,088/-(Rs.4,382/- x 1/2 x 12 x 14).
4. On addition of a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss of love and
affection, Rs.25,000/- towards funeral expenses and Rs.10,000/-
towards loss to estate, the overall compensation would come to
Rs.5,03,088/-. Therefore, the award of compensation of
Rs.5,55,000/- granted by the Claims Tribunal cannot be said to
be exorbitant or excessive calling for interference by this Court.
5. The appeal therefore, has to fail; the same is accordingly
dismissed.
6. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
7. Statutory amount, if any, deposited shall be refunded to the
Appellant Insurance Company.
(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE APRIL 06, 2015 pst
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!