Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4972 Del
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CM(M) No.905/2014 & C.M.Nos.16563/2014(Exemption),
16564/2014 (Stay)
% 30th September, 2014
SH. MAHENDER SINGH ......Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
L&T FINANCE LIMITED ...... Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. On the first call, passover was prayed which was granted. At the time
of granting passover, it was made clear that no further passover or
adjournment will be granted. Even on the second call when the case is
called out, no one appears for the petitioner. I have therefore gone through
the record and I am proceeding to dispose of the petition.
2. I am indeed amazed at this petition which is filed under Articles 226
and 227 of the Constitution of India, because, this petition challenges an
arbitration Award which is passed on 14.8.2014 by an arbitrator in favour of
the respondent/L&T Finance Ltd. Surely if an Award is passed, and the
petitioner has objections to the same, that arbitration Award cannot be
challenged by filing of a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India but the remedy to be invoked is filing of a petition under Section 34 of
the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
3. If for any reasons, the petitioner does not have to file objections and
he has a legal right to file a suit, then obviously that is the mode which has
to be adopted for claiming relief, but, there cannot be filed a petition under
Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an Award.
4. Dismissed.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 KA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!