Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Times Business Solutions Limited vs .............
2014 Latest Caselaw 4882 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4882 Del
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2014

Delhi High Court
Times Business Solutions Limited vs ............. on 26 September, 2014
$~36
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    CO.PET. 289/2014
IN THE MATTER OF
TIMES BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LIMITED ....Petitioners

                   Through: Mr. Abhishek Seth, Mr. Abhixit
                            Singh, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh
                            and    Mr.     Rajeev     Kumar
                            Advocates for the Petitioners.

                             Mr.    Atma     Sah  Assistant
                             Registrar of Companies for the
                             Regional Director.
                             Mr. S.B Gautam, the Official
                             Liquidator.
      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                 ORDER
      %          26.09.2014

      SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)
      CA No. 2133/2014

This is an application by the Official Liquidator seeking condonation of delay in filing the report.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the report is condoned.

The report is directed to be taken on record. ==================================================

CO.PET. 289/2014

1. This second motion joint petition has been filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("Act") seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation ("Scheme") of Times Business Solutions Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) with Times Internet Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company) (hereinafter all Companies collectively referred to as Petitioner Companies). A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed with the Petition.

2. The registered offices of the Petitioner Companies are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The details of the respective dates of incorporation of the Petitioner Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been given in the Petition.

4. The copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the Annual Accounts of the Petitioner Companies for the year ended 31 st March 2013 have also been enclosed with the Petition. ==================================================

5. The copies of Resolutions passed by the Board of Director of the Petitioner Companies approving the Scheme of Amalgamation have also been filed along with the Petition.

6. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Companies submits that no proceedings under sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 is pending against the Petitioner Companies.

7. The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed C.A. (M) 67 of 2014 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation/convening of meetings. Vide Order dated 22nd April 2014, this Court allowed the Application and requirement of convening all the meetings of Shareholders, Secured and Un-secured Creditors of the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company were dispensed with. There are Secured Creditors in the Applicant Companies.

8. The Petitioner Companies had thereafter filed the present Petition seeking sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide Order dated 5th May 2014, notice of the Petition was directed to be issued to the Registrar of Companies, Regional Director, Northern Region,

==================================================

Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Official Liquidator attached with this Court. Citations were also directed to be published in "Business Standard" (English) and "Dainik Bhaskar" (Hindi). Affidavit of Service and Publication has been filed by the Petitioners showing compliance regarding service of the Petition on the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator, and also regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspaper. Copies of the newspaper cuttings, in original, containing the publications have also been filed along with the Affidavit of Service.

9. In response to the notice issued, the Official Liquidator sought information from the Petitioner Companies. Based on the information received, the Official Liquidator has filed his Report dated 12th September 2014 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint against the proposed Scheme from any person/party interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the Transferor Companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members, creditors or to public

==================================================

interest as per the 2nd proviso of section 394(1) of the Act.

10. In response to the notice issued in the Petition, learned Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs has filed his Affidavit/Report dated 17th September, 2014. Relying on the Scheme of Amalgamation, he has stated that, upon sanction of the Scheme, all the employees of the Transferor Companies shall become the employees of the Transferee Company without any break or interruption in their services. Further, the learned Regional Director submits that despite notice, the Income Tax Authorities have not raised any objection with regard to the Scheme.

11. The learned Regional Director in his Affidavit has observed that in Para 14 of part II of the Scheme it is provided that upon coming into the effect of the scheme, clause 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the Memorandum of Association of the Transferor Company as mentioned in the scheme shall be inserted into the main clause III (A) of the Memorandum of Association of the Transferee Company. In this regard that the Transferee Company be asked to comply with the provisions of

==================================================

section 17 of the Companies Act, 1956 or the corresponding provisions of the Companies Act 2013 in respect to the proposed alteration of the Memorandum & Articles of Association of the Petitioner Transferee Company.

12. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the judgment of this Court in CO.PET. 379/2014 in the case of C&S Electric MV Pvt. Limited dated 10.09.2014 wherein it was held as under:-

"16. In response to the aforesaid observation, the learned counsel for Petitioner Companies submits that amendment in the Memorandum & Articles of Association of the Transferee Company is part of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Further, as also stated in para No. 15.3 of the Scheme of Amalgamation, the Transferee Company shall file with the Registrar of Companies, Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi all requisite forms and complete the compliance and procedural requirements under the Companies Act, if any.

17. This Court by order dated 23.05.2014 in CO.PET 134/2014 titled M/s Capital 18 Fincap Pvt. Ltd and order dated 07.08.23014 in CO.PET 246/2014 titled Kalyani Alstom Power Limited & Ors held that a scheme of arrangement in terms of section 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 is a complete code in itself, requiring sanction by the ==================================================

jurisdictional High Court, which is a single window clearance and as such, does not require any other procedure to be followed separately. Upon sanction of the scheme, the order of the court shall be filed with the Registrar of Companies and the same shall constitute compliance of the provisions of the Act for change of the Memorandum of Association."

13. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner Companies has also undertaken by way of an Affidavit that the Petitioner Companies shall comply with and follow the provisions of Section 13 of the Companies Act, 2013 which is corresponding to Section 17 of the Companies Act 1956 and all the applicable procedure as prescribed in the Companies Act, 2013 so as to effectuate the change in the main objects and alteration in the memorandum and Articles of Association immediately upon the Scheme becoming effective.

14. In view of the aforesaid clarifications and undertaking given by the Petitioners, the concerns of the Regional Director have been duly addressed.

15. No objection has been received to the Scheme from any other party. Mr. Sidhant Khosala, Authorized Signatory of the Petitioner Transferor Company and Mr, Joy

==================================================

Basu, Authorized Signatory of the Petitioner Transferee Company have filed Affidavits confirming that neither the Petitioner Companies nor their Counsel has received any objection pursuant to citations published in the newspapers.

16. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and Creditors of the Petitioner Companies, representation/report filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region and Official Liquidator attached with this Court to the proposed scheme, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioner Companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with law.

17. Certified copy of the order will be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the date of receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of Sections 391 and 394 of the Act, and in terms of the Scheme the whole of the undertaking, the properties, rights and powers of the Transferor Company be transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company without any further act or deed. Similarly, in terms of

==================================================

the Scheme, all the liabilities and duties of the Transferor Companies be transferred to the Transferee Company without any further act or deed. Upon the Scheme coming into effect, the Transferor Company shall stand dissolved without following the process of winding up.

18. It is, however, clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty or taxes or any other charges, if payable in accordance with any law; or permission/ compliance with any other department which may be specifically required under any law.

19. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner Companies (collectively) would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- in the Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator within three weeks from today. The statement is accepted.

20. The Petition is allowed in the above terms.

Order Dasti.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2014/st

==================================================

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter