Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4457 Del
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2014
$~28
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ Co. Appl. (M) No. 128/2014
IN THE MATTER OF
SHREE SHYAM SPINTEX PVT LTD ......Applicants
Through: Mr. Rajeev K Goel and Mr.
Naresh Kumar, Advocates
for Applicant Companies.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
ORDER
% 15.09.2014
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)
1. This is a first motion joint Application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("Act") in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation ("Scheme") of Shree Shyam Spintex Pvt Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the Transferor Company) with VSP Enterprises Pvt Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the Transferee Company) (hereinafter all Companies collectively referred to as Applicant Companies). A copy of the proposed Scheme has been enclosed along with the Application.
================================================
2. The registered offices of the Applicant Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and are within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The details with regard to the date of incorporation of Applicant Companies, their Authorized, Issued, Subscribed and Paid up Capital have been set out in the present application.
4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31 st March, 2013 of the Applicant Companies have also been enclosed with the present Application.
5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submits that no proceeding under sections 235 to 251 of the Act is pending against any of the Applicant Companies as on the date of the present Application.
6. The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of all the Applicant Companies. Copies of the Board Resolutions have been filed along with the present Application.
================================================
7. The status of the Equity Shareholders, Secured and Un-
secured Creditors of the Transferor Company and Transferee Company is apparent from the chart given below:-
Company No. of Consent No. of Consent No. of Consent Share Given Secured Given Unsecured Given holders Creditors Creditors Transferor 4 All Nil N.A Nil N.A Company
Company (92.50% in value terms)
8. In view of the above, a prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders, Secured Creditors and Un-secured Creditors of the Applicant Companies.
9. In view of the written consent given by 37 (constituting of 92.50% in value) out of 40 Un-secured Creditors of the Transferee Company, the requirement of convening meeting of Un-secured Creditors of the Transferee Company is dispensed with.
================================================
10. Since there are no Secured Creditors and Un-secured Creditors of the Transferor Company, therefore the requirement of convening meeting of Secured and Un- secured Creditors of the Transferor Company does not arise.
11. In view of the written consents/NOC obtained by the Shareholders of the Transferor Company and the Shareholders, Secured Creditors and Un-secured Creditors of the Transferee Company, the requirement of convening meetings of the Shareholders of the Transferor Company and the Shareholders, Secured Creditors and Un-secured Creditors of the Transferee Company are dispensed with.
12. The Application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.
Order Dasti.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
SEPTEMBER 15, 2014
================================================
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!