Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4345 Del
Judgement Date : 10 September, 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Special Appeal No. 69 of 2012
With
Delay Condonation Application No. 3599 of 2012
Union of India & others. ........... Appellants
Versus
Satender Nath Rai & others. ............. Respondents
Special Appeal No. 83 of 2012
With
Delay Condonation Application No. 4307 of 2012
Union of India & others. ........... Appellants
Versus
Israr Mohammad. ............. Respondent
&
Special Appeal No. 84 of 2012
With
Delay Condonation Application No. 4317 of 2012
Union of India & others. ........... Appellants
Versus
Sarwan Kumar. ............. Respondent
Mr. B.P.S. Mer, Standing Counsel for the Central Government / appellants.
None for the respondents.
JUDGMENT
Coram: Hon'ble K.M. Joseph, C.J.
Hon'ble V.K. Bist, J.
Dated: 10th September, 2014 K.M. JOSEPH, C.J. (Oral) In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that no orders are required, as the matters have become infructuous; even though the learned counsel for the respondents is not present, we condone the delay. The Applications are, accordingly, allowed.
2. The appeals are closed as infructuous.
(V.K. Bist, J.) (K.M. Joseph, C. J.)
10.09.2014 10.09.2014
G
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!