Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Beumer Technology India Pvt. Ltd vs .............
2014 Latest Caselaw 4211 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4211 Del
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2014

Delhi High Court
Beumer Technology India Pvt. Ltd vs ............. on 8 September, 2014
Author: Sanjeev Sachdeva
$~6
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    Co. Appl. (M) No. 96/2014

IN THE MATTER OF

BEUMER TECHNOLOGY INDIA PVT. LTD. ...Applicants

                  Through: Mr. Karan Khanna and Ms.
                           Asmita Kumar Advocates for
                           Applicant Companies.

     CORAM:
     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                ORDER

% 08.09.2014

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)

1. This is a first motion joint Application under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("Act") in connection with a Scheme of Amalgamation ("Scheme") of Beumer Technology India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) with Enexco Teknologies India Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company) (hereinafter all Companies collectively referred to as Applicant Companies) and their respective

================================================

Shareholders. The Scheme has been enclosed with the Application.

2. The registered offices of the Applicant Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and are within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The details with regard to the date of incorporation of Applicant Companies, their Authorized, Issued, Subscribed and Paid up Capital have been set out in the present application.

4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31st March, 2013 of the Applicant Companies have also been enclosed with the present application.

5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submits that no proceeding under sections 235 to 251 of the Act is pending against any of the Applicant Companies as on the date of the present affidavit in support of summon.

================================================

6. The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of all the Applicant Companies. Copies of the Board Resolutions have been filed along with the present application.

7. The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Un-secured Creditors of the Transferor Company and Transferee Company is apparent from the chart given below:-

Company      No. of    Consent    No.    of   Consent   No.       of   Consent
             Share     Given      Secured     Given     unsecured      Given
             holders              Creditors             Creditors
Transferor      2         All         1         All         66         Not
Company                                                                given
Transferee      2         All         4         All         569        Not
Company                                                                given


8. A prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders, Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Companies.

9. In view of the written consents/NOC given by the shareholder of Transferor Company and Transferee Company the requirement of convening meetings of

================================================

Equity Shareholders of the Transferor Company and Transferee Company are dispensed with.

10. The sole Secured Creditor of the Transferor Company, namely Deutsche Bank (Corporate Banking) has given a written consent/NOC, however, the Board Resolution has not been enclosed along with "No Objection Certificate". The applicant is directed to issue a specific notice to the said Secured Creditor at the time of moving of the second motion calling for their objection, if any, to the Scheme. Further, the requirement of convening meeting of Secured Creditor of the Transferor Company is dispensed with.

11. Written consents/NOC has been given by the all four Secured Creditors of the Transferee Company, namely Deutsche Bank (Global Banking), Canara Bank, HDFC and State Bank of Patiala, however, the Board Resolution has not been enclosed along with respective "No Objection Certificate". The Applicant is directed to issue a specific notice to the said Secured Creditors at the time of moving of the second motion calling for their objection, if any, to the Scheme. Further the

================================================

requirement of convening meeting of Secured Creditors of the Transferee Company is dispensed with.

12. Learned Counsel for the Applicants submits that the Net Worth of the Applicant companies is positive as per the certificate issued by Manish Ravi & Associates, Chartered Accountants dated 20th August 2014 and the Net Worth of the Transferor company will get added to the Net Worth of the Transferee Company pursuant to the merger and therefore, the rights and interests of the unsecured creditors of the Applicant companies will not be adversely affected and in fact will be placed in a better position vis-à-vis their security post amalgamation. The Applicants, therefore, prays that the requirement of convening and holding the meeting of the unsecured of the Applicant Companies may be dispensed with.

13. In support of his submissions, the learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies placed reliance on the judgments of this Court in the matter of In Re.: Scheme of Amalgamation of O C Denims and Special Finishes Limited & Anr. [CA (M) No. 86/2013

================================================

decided on 9 th July 2013]; In Re.: Scheme of Amalgamation of M/s BRY-AIR (Asia) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr [CA (M) No. 84/2013 decided on 5 th July 2013]; In Re.: Scheme of Amalgamation of M/s Global Digital Technologies Limited with MVL Industries Limited [CA (M) No. 108/2012 decided on 2 nd July 2012]; and In Re.: Scheme of Amalgamation of Vodafone Essar Ltd. & Ors and Vodafone Essar Infrastructure Ltd. [CA (M) No. 113/2010 decided on 29th May 2010] wherein this Court, under similar circumstances, has dispensed with the requirement of convening and holding the meeting of the secured and unsecured creditors. The learned Counsel has also placed on record the net worth certificate issued by Manish Ravi & Associates, Chartered Accountants dated 20 th August 2014. The certificate shows that the pre-amalgamation Net Worth of the Transferor

company is Rs.20,99,89,222/- and the pre and post

amalgamation net worth of the Transferee Company is

Rs.82,45,28,941/- and would be Rs.1034,51,88,164/-

respectively. Further, post-amalgamation, the value of

================================================

debt (Secured and Unsecured Creditors) of the

Transferee company would be Rs.104,54,55,314/-

against the value of the assets of Rs.186,99,84,225/- (at

their respective fair values), therefore, the interests of the creditors of either of the Applicant companies would not be adversely affected and would be placed in a better position vis-à-vis their security post- amalgamation.

14. In view of the above and considering the law as laid down, the requirement of convening and holding the meetings of the unsecured creditors of the Applicant companies are dispensed with.

15. The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Order Dasti.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

SEPTEMBER 08, 2014/sv

================================================

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter