Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Captain Mukul Gupta vs The Kingfisher Airlines Ltd.
2014 Latest Caselaw 6292 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 6292 Del
Judgement Date : 28 November, 2014

Delhi High Court
Captain Mukul Gupta vs The Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. on 28 November, 2014
Author: S. P. Garg
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                            RESERVED ON : 17th NOVEMBER, 2014
                             DECIDED ON : 28th NOVEMBER, 2014


+     CS (OS) 1061/2013 & IA Nos.5675/2014 & 18954/2013
      CAPTAIN MUKUL GUPTA                                 ..... Plaintiff
                         Through :     Mr.Jasmeet Singh, Advocate with
                                       Mr.Saurabh Tiwari, Advocate.


                         VERSUS


      THE KINGFISHER AIRLINES LTD.                        ..... Defendant
                         Through :     None.


       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

S.P.GARG, J.

1. The plaintiff has instituted suit under Order XXXVII CPC for

recovery of ` 20,09,795/- (`13,25,000/- as salary amount, ` 3,19,825/- as

interest, ` 1,86,000/- as gratuity, ` 93,970/- as 45 days' leave encashment

and ` 85,000/- as additional flying allowance above 70 Hrs.) against the

defendant, pleadings the following :

(i) The plaintiff was appointed as "Transition Captain" for A320

w.e.f. 22.04.2006 vide appointment letter dated 17.02.2006

with a consolidated salary of ` 3,30,250/- per month, which

was subsequently increased to ` 5,30,000/- per month w.e.f.

01.07.2011.

(ii) The defendant was, however, in a financial mess and was

unable to pay the salaries and owing whereto the plaintiff had

no option but to resign from the employment of the defendant

vide letter dated 14.02.2012, which was accepted by the

defendant by conduct. However, the plaintiff did not pay the

arrears of salary and other emoluments.

(iii) The plaintiff has not been paid his salary for the month of

December, 2011, January, 2012 and 15 days' salary for

February, 2012 i.e. for about two and half months.

(iv) Besides the aforesaid amount, the plaintiff also claims

interest thereon @ 18% per annum, which comes to

`3,19,825/- and gratuity ` 1,86,000/-.

2. The suit was first time listed before the Joint Registrar on

27.05.2013. Summons to the defendant on the prescribed proforma under

Order XXXVII CPC were ordered to be issued. The defendant was served

on 01.08.2013. Appearance was put on behalf of the defendant on

06.09.2013 and it was informed that appropriate application in due course

would be moved. The matter was subsequently, referred to Delhi High

Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre for settlement. However, the

matter could not be settled there. IA No. 5675/2014 under Order XXXVII

Rule 3(4) CPC was moved on behalf of the plaintiff for issuance of

summons for judgment. The defendant, however, did not file any

application for leave to contest within the period of limitation.

3. Since the defendant did not apply for leave to defend, under

Order XXXVII Rule 3 (6) CPC, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment

forthwith.

4. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has filed on record judgment

in CS (OS) 1063/2013 and IA No.17077/2013 decided on 25.08.2014 by

HMJ Manmohan Singh. Similar claim was raised by Captain Dinesh Kant

Sharma against the defendant - the Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. therein. In the

said proceedings the learned counsel for the plaintiff confined his claim

only to the principal amount as there was no pre-suit agreement for

interest. Leaned counsel for the plaintiff has further filed on record

judgment in CS(OS) No.1152/2013 dated 03.04.2014 of HMJ Rajiv Sahai

Endlaw in a similar matter. This Court was of the view that the amount

towards leave encashment and extra flying did not fall within the ambit of

Order XXXVII. Learned counsel for the plaintiff therein opted to give up

the said claim. The said judgment has attained finality. The claim under

these two heads hence cannot be accepted in the present suit under Order

XXXVII CPC.

5. In the light of above discussion axiomatically, the suit of the

plaintiff for recovery of arrears of salary of two and a half months of

`13,25,000/- and of gratuity ` 1,86,000/- due from the defendant, has to

be decreed. As far as claim of the plaintiff for interest is concerned, I

deem it proper to award it @ 10% per annum from the end of each month

from which salary is due till the date of decree and interest @ 10% on the

gratuity of ` 1,86,000/- from 15.02.2012 till the date of decree.

6. A decree is accordingly passed in favour of the plaintiff and

against the defendant for recovery of `13,25,000/- with interest @ 10%

per annum from the end of each month from which salary is due till the

date of decree and ` 1,86,000/- with interest @ 10% from 15.02.2012 till

the date of decree.

7. The counsel's fee is assessed to ` 15000/-.

8. The suit and all pending IAs stand disposed of accordingly.

9. Decree-sheet be prepared accordingly.

(S.P.GARG) JUDGE NOVEMBER 28, 2014 / tr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter