Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jawala Real Estate Private ... vs .............
2014 Latest Caselaw 5810 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 5810 Del
Judgement Date : 14 November, 2014

Delhi High Court
Jawala Real Estate Private ... vs ............. on 14 November, 2014
$~27
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    CO.PET. 452/2014
IN THE MATTER OF
JAWALA REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED....Petitioner
                   Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate for
                            the Petitioners.

                            Mr.    Atma    Sah,  Assistant
                            Registrar of Companies for the
                            Regional Director.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
           ORDER

% 14.11.2014

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) CA No. 2592/2014 (application seeking condonation of delay on behalf of the Regional Director) This is an application by the Regional Director seeking condonation of delay in filing the report.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has no objection to the delay being condoned.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the report is condoned.

The report is directed to be taken on record.

==========================================================

CO.PET. 452/2014

1. This second motion petition has been filed under sections 391 to 394 read with Sections 100 to 103 the Companies Act, 1956 ("Act") seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation ("Scheme") of Proficient Buildwell Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) with Jawala Real Estate Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Transferee Company) (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner Company). A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed with the Petition.

2. The registered office of the Petitioner Transferee Company is situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Hon‟ble Court. The registered office of the Transferor Company is situated in Mumbai, outside the jurisdiction of this Hon‟ble Court.

3. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of the Transferor and Transferee Company, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been given in the Petition.

==========================================================

4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited Accounts of Transferor and Transferee Company have also been enclosed with the Petition.

5. Copies of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of the Transferor and Transferee Company approving the Scheme of Amalgamation have also been placed on record.

6. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Company submits that no proceedings under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 is pending against the Transferor and Transferee Company.

7. The Petitioner Transferee Company had earlier filed C.A (M) No. 105 of 2014 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation/convening the meetings. Vide order dated 29 th May 2014, this Court allowed the Application and dispensed with the meeting of Equity Shareholders and further directed to convene the separate meetings of the Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors of the Petitioner Transferee Company. From the reports of the Chairpersons at the aforesaid meetings, it is apparent that the Scheme was ==========================================================

approved unanimously by the Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors participating in the meeting.

8. The Petitioner Transferee Company has thereafter filed the present Petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 24 th July 2014, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the Registrar of Companies and the Central Government through Regional Director. Citations were also directed to be published in „Business Standard‟ (English, Delhi Edition) and „Jansatta‟ (Hindi, Delhi Edition). Affidavit of Service and Publication has been filed by the Petitioner Transferee Company showing compliance regarding service of the petition on the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Registrar of Companies, and also regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers. Copies of the newspaper cuttings, in original, containing the publications have been filed along with the Affidavit of Service.

9. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, learned Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs has filed his

==========================================================

Affidavit dated 27 th October 2014. Relying on Clause 7.1 of Part B of the Scheme Amalgamation and Arrangement he has stated in Para No. 5(i) that all the staff/employees of the Transferor Company shall become the employees of the Amalgamated Company without any break or interruption in their services upon sanctioning of the Scheme of Amalgamation and Arrangement by the Hon'ble Court. Further, learned Regional Director submits that despite notice, Income Tax Authorities has not raised any observation with respect to the Scheme.

10. No objection has been received to the Scheme from any other party. Mr. Vishal Ghadigaonkar, Authorized Signatory of the Transferee Company, has filed an affidavit dated 27 th October, 2014, confirming that neither the Petitioner Company nor its Legal Counsel has received any objection pursuant to the citations published in the newspapers.

11. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and Creditors of the Petitioner Company, representation/reports filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region to the proposed Scheme of

==========================================================

Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioner Company will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with law. However, it will be subject to the orders passed by High Court of Judicature at Bombay.

12. Certified copy of the order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the date of receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, and in terms of the Scheme, the whole or part of the undertaking, the property, rights and powers of the Transferor Company be transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company without any further act or deed. Similarly, in terms of the Scheme, all the liabilities and duties of the Transferor Company be transferred to the Transferee Company without any further act or deed.

13. It is, however, clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty or taxes or any other charges, if

==========================================================

payable in accordance with any law; or permission/ compliance with any other department which may be specifically required under any law.

14. The Petition is allowed in the above terms.

Order Dasti.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER 14, 2014 st

==========================================================

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter