Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 5790 Del
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ EFA-12/2013
% 13th November , 2014
S.D.HADA ......Petitioner
Through: Mr. Muneesh Malhotra, Adv.
VERSUS
PRAVIN KUMAR AGGARWAL ...... Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. The objector/petitioner by this execution first appeal takes exception
to the impugned order of the executing court dated 22.3.2013 which has
dismissed the objections filed by the objector/petitioner and has directed
execution of the money decree of Rs.6,74,733/- against the Judgment Debtor
(JD) who has not been impleaded as a respondent in these proceedings and
which JD is the son of the present objector/petitioner.
2. The executing court notes that no warrants of attachment have been
issued against the immovable property being Hada Farm, 30, Rajokri Road,
Samalkha, New Delhi but the warrants of attachment have been issued only
EFA-12/2013 Page 1 of 2
against the movable properties therein of the JD because the JD who is the
son of the petitioner/objector is admittedly found to be living in the property.
It therefore cannot be believed that there would be no moveable properties
of the JD in this immovable property. The objector/petitioner did not file
any proof whatsoever that the movable properties which are lying in the
property Hada Farm do not belong to the JD but belong to her.
3. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the appeal and the
same is therefore dismissed. No costs.
NOVEMBER 13, 2014 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
ib
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!