Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Narender Pratap & Anr. vs State Of (Gnct Of) Delhi & Ors.
2014 Latest Caselaw 5550 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 5550 Del
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2014

Delhi High Court
Narender Pratap & Anr. vs State Of (Gnct Of) Delhi & Ors. on 7 November, 2014
$~25
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                              Judgment delivered on: 7th November, 2014

+                        W.P.(C) 7519/2014

NARENDER PRATAP & ANR.                                    .... Petitioners
                 Represented by:            Mr.Ritesh Khatri, Advocate.

                         Versus

STATE OF (GNCT OF) DELHI & ORS.                         ..... Respondents
                   Represented by:          Mr.Vinod Wadhwa and
                                            Ms. Nanidini Aggarwal,
                                            Advocates for Respondents
                                            No. 1, 2 and 5.
                                            Ms.Mrinalini       Sen     and
                                            Ms.Mrinmoi          Chatterjee,
                                            Advocates for Respondent
                                            No.3.
                                            Ms. Mansi Gupta, Advocate
                                            for Respondent No.4.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

CM No. 17777/2014 (for exemption)

Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 7519/2014

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek directions thereby directing the respondents No. 1, 2 and 5 to forthwith take steps to stop illegal and unlawful activities of constructions and encroachment going

on over Khasra Nos. 1152/73 and 1153/73 of Village Madanpur Khadar, Delhi-76.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the aforesaid Khasras belong to respondent No.3/Delhi Development Authority (in short 'DDA') and due to unauthorised construction thereon, passage of the petitioners is blocked. To this effect, the petitioners made a complaint to DDA on 18.12.2013; however, there is no response from their side.

3. Keeping in view the averments made in the instant petition and the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, I direct the Commissioner (Land), DDA, to decide the aforesaid representation dated 18.12.2013 within three weeks from today and shall communicate the decision taken to the petitioners within one week thereafter.

4. I here make it clear that if the petitioners feel still aggrieved with the decision, they may approach to the appropriate authority in accordance with law.

5. I further make it clear that if any illegal and unlawful activities which is blocking the passage of the petitioners is going on, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the concerned SDM, New Delhi.

6. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition is disposed of. CM No. 17776/2014 (for stay)

With the disposal of the present petition, the instant application has become infructuous. The same is accordingly dismissed.

SURESH KAIT (JUDGE) NOVEMBER 07, 2014/sb

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter