Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 3374 Del
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2014
$~31
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ Co. Appl. (M) No. 112/2014
IN THE MATTER OF PARTEEK FINANCE AND
INVESTMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR
....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Kunal Tandon,
Advocate
CORA M:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
ORDER
% 28.07.2014
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)
1. This is a first motion Application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short Act) is in connection with a Scheme of Amalgamation (for short "Scheme") of Parteek Finance and Investment Company Private Limited (hereinafter referred to a s Transferor/Applicant Company) with PI Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee/Non - Applicant Company) and their respective shareholders and creditors. A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed
==================================================
with the Application.
2. The registered office of Transferor Company is situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court while the registered office of Transferee Company is situated at Udaipur, Rajasthan. It is stated by the Applicant Company that a separate petition is filed by the non - applicant company before the Hon'ble High Court of Jodhpur, seeking approval of the scheme.
3. The details with regard to the date of incorporation of the Applicant Company, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been set out in application.
4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association, latest Audited Accounts as on 31.03.2013 of the Applicant Company have been enclosed with the Application.
5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Company submits that no proceeding under Sections 235 to 251 of the Act is pending against the Applicant Company as on
==================================================
the date of the present Application.
6. The proposed scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Applicant Company. Certified true copies of the Board Resolutions have been filed along with the Application.
7. The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Company and the consents obtained from them for the proposed scheme is clearly apparent from the chart given in the application which is as follows:-
Com pa ny No. o f Consent No of Consent No of Consent
Sha re Giv en Secured Giv en Unsecured Giv en
holder Credito r Credito r
Transferor 9 All Nil NA Nil NA
Compa ny /
Applicant
Compa ny
8. A prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders, Secured and Unsecured creditors of the Applicant Company.
==================================================
9. In view of the written consents/NOC given by the all Shareholders in Applicant Company, requirement of convening the meetings of shareholders of Applicant Company is dispensed with.
10. Since there are no Secured and Unsecured Creditors in the applicant company the question of convening the meetings of the Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors of the applicant company does not arise.
11. The application stands allowed in above terms.
Order dasti.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JULY 28, 2014/hj
==================================================
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!