Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 884 Del
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ FAO No.314/2013
% 17th February, 2014
MS. KAMAL MALHOTRA AND ORS. ..... Appellants
Through: None.
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for
respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. This is an appeal filed against the impugned judgment of the
Guardianship Court dated 31.5.2013 dismissing the petition which sought
permission to sell the undivided share of the minor children, petitioner nos.1
and 2, through their natural mother, petitioner no.3/Ms. Kamal Malhotra.
2. The Guardianship Court has dismissed the petition only
because of the conclusion in para 16 that the petitioners have failed to file
photocopies of the documents pertaining to the suit property and also that
the valuation report of the suit property has not been filed. Since the
FAO No.314/2013 Page 1 of 3
petitioner no.3 is the natural mother of the petitioner nos.1 and 2, and the
respondent nos.2 and 3 before the Guardianship Court (and who are
respondent nos.2 and 3 herein) have given no objection for selling of the
property of the petitioner nos.1 and 2, this appeal is allowed by remanding
the matter back to the Guardianship Court and giving an opportunity to the
appellants to file valuation report so that directions can be issued for the
minimum price at which the property can be sold and further directions be
issued with respect to how the sale proceeds are to be utilized.
3. I may state that there is no need of filing of title documents
inasmuch as the suit property was owned by one Smt. Pushpa Devi Malhotra
and in whose name an allotment letter has been filed before this Court at
running page 29, and which is accepted. Smt. Pushpa Devi Malhotra died
leaving behind two sons, namely Sh. Sandeep Kumar Malhotra and Sh.
Sanjiv Kumar Malhotra and one daughter Ms. Meeta Vig. Petitioner nos.1
and 2 are the children of Sh. Sandeep Kumar Malhotra and the other two
children of Smt. Pushpa Devi Malhotra, namely Sh. Sanjeev Kumar
Malhotra and Ms. Meeta Vig who are respondent nos.2 and 3 herein have
given their no objection for sale of the suit property.
FAO No.314/2013 Page 2 of 3
4. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed and disposed of by
remanding the petition back for disposal to the Guardianship Court and
before the Guardianship Court the appellants will file the necessary
valuation report for the Court to determine what is the minimum price at
which the suit property should be sold. The Guardianship Court can
thereafter pass appropriate directions with respect to utilization of the sale
proceeds of the property.
5. Parties to appear before the District & Sessions Judge, Saket
courts, New Delhi on 19th March, 2014 and the District & Sessions Judge
will thereafter mark the guardianship petition for disposal to a competent
court in accordance with law. Trial court record be sent back so that the
same is available to the District & Sessions Judge on the date fixed.
FEBRUARY 17, 2014 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
Ne
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!