Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Union Of India vs Smt. Sushila & Anr.
2014 Latest Caselaw 1005 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 1005 Del
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2014

Delhi High Court
Union Of India vs Smt. Sushila & Anr. on 24 February, 2014
Author: Valmiki J. Mehta
*            IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                   L.A. Appeal Nos.213/2013 & 215/2013

%                                                    24th February, 2014

1.    L.A. Appeal No.213/2013 and C.M. No.15304/2013 (condonation
      of delay)

UNION OF INDIA                                       ..... Appellant
                          Through:       Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate.


                          Versus
SMT. SUSHILA & ANR.                                        ..... Respondents
                  Through:               Mr. R.S. Dalal, Advocate for
                                         respondent No.1.
                                         Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for
                                         respondent No.2.

2.    L.A. Appeal No.215/2013

UNION OF INDIA                                       ..... Appellant
                          Through:       Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate.


                          Versus
SATPAL & ANR.                                  ..... Respondents
                          Through:       Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate for
                                         respondent No.1.
                                         Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for
                                         respondent No.2.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?


L.A. Appeal Nos. 213/2013 & 215/2013                            Page 1 of 3
 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.            Counsel for the parties could not dispute that issue of

enhancement of compensation in this case is covered by the judgment of a

learned Single Judge of this Court dated 23.8.2011 passed in a bunch of

cases with lead case being Jai Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr. L.A.

Appeal No.266/2008. Paras 95 and 96 of the judgment read as under:-


        "Village Sanoth Notification dated 27.1.2003
     95. Pertaining to the appeals and cross objections by the land
     owners and Union of India as per 'GRID-P' pertaining to the
     notification dated 27.1.2003 relating to village Sanoth, I note
     that the learned Land Acquisition Collector has placed the
     lands in 3 categories and I find that the learned Reference
     Court has without any discussion held the lands as of
     uniform category while awarding compensation.

     96. On the mean average basis which I have been following
     by increasing the price as of 1.4.2001 with reference to the
     notification issued by the Government as also by increasing
     the same with reference to the sale deed dated 20.5.2002 and
     taking the mean average, for Category 'A' lands the price
     comes to Rs.19,43,500/- per acre and for Category 'B' land
     the price comes to Rs.18,94,912.50 per acre and for
     Category 'C' lands the price comes to `18,47,539.68 per
     acre. I find that the learned Reference Court has uniformly
     determined fair market value at Rs.19,13,765/- and thus such
     appeals or cross objections which have been filed by land
     owners the same have to be dismissed in so far they pertain
     to Category 'B' and Category 'C' lands and similar would
     be the fate of appeals and cross objections filed by Union of
     India pertaining to Category 'A' lands. The said appeals and
     cross objections as per 'GRID-P' are dismissed. Appeals and


L.A. Appeal Nos. 213/2013 & 215/2013                              Page 2 of 3
      cross objections filed by land owners pertaining to Category
     'A' lands are allowed by decreeing compensation payable in
     sum of Rs.19,43,500/- per acre and needless to state on the
     enhanced compensation statutory benefits as per the Land
     Acquisition Act 1894 as interpreted in the judgment reported
     as Sunder Vs. UOI 2001 (93) DLT 569 shall be paid save
     and except in such appeals and cross objections where there
     is a delay, interest would not be paid for the period of delay.
     Proportionate costs as well. The appeals and cross objections
     filed by Union of India pertaining to Category 'B' and
     Category 'C' lands are allowed by modifying the relatable
     decree in the Reference Order by reducing the compensation
     for Category 'B' land to Rs.18,94,912.50 per acre and for
     Category 'C' land to Rs.18,47,539.68 per acre."


2.            In view of the above, the present appeals are disposed of in

terms of the observations made in paras 95 and 96 stated above and the same

benefits will be given as stated in paras 95 and 96 of the judgment dated

23.8.2011 to the private respondent no.1 in these appeals. Parties are left to

bear their own costs.




FEBRUARY 24, 2014                               VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

Ne

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter