Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 6778 Del
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2014
$~38
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ Co. Appl. (M) No. 168/2014
IN THE MATTER OF
MOUNT ECHO BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED
....Applicants
Through: Mr. Ashish Middha,
Advocate for the
Applicants.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
ORDER
% 15.12.2014
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)
1. This is first motion joint Application under section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("Act") in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation ("Scheme") of Mount Echo Buildwell Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) with Paramount Propbuild Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company) (hereinafter collectively referred to as Applicant Companies). A copy of the proposed Scheme is enclosed with the Application.
====================================================
2. The registered offices of the Applicant Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The details of the dates of incorporation of the Applicant Companies, its authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been enclosed with the Application.
4. The certified copy of the Memorandum and Articles of Association, latest Accounts as on 31.03.2014 of the Applicant Companies has been enclosed with the Application.
5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submits that no proceedings under sections 235 to 251 of the Act are pending against the Applicant Companies as on the date of the present Application.
6. The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Applicant Companies. Copies of the Board Resolutions have been filed along with the Application.
====================================================
7. The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Companies and the consents obtained by them for the proposed Scheme are as follows:
Company No. of Consent No of Consent No of Consent
Share Given Secured Given Unsecured Given
holder Creditor Creditor
Transferor 2 All Nil N.A 3 All
Company
Transferee 2 All Nil N.A 15 All
Company
8. A prayer has been made for dispensation from the requirement of convening the meetings of the Shareholders, Secured and the Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Companies.
9. In view of the written consents/NOC given by all the Shareholders of the Applicant Companies, the requirement of convening meeting of Shareholders of the Applicant Companies is dispensed with.
10. Since there are no Secured Creditors of Applicant Companies, therefore the requirement of convening
====================================================
meeting of Secured Creditors of Applicant Companies does not arise.
11. In view of the written consents/NOC given by all the Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Companies, the requirement of convening the meeting of the Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Companies is dispensed with.
12. The Application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.
Order Dasti.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J DECEMBER 15, 2014 sv
====================================================
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!