Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hardeep Johar & Ors. vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi Represented ...
2014 Latest Caselaw 6667 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 6667 Del
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2014

Delhi High Court
Hardeep Johar & Ors. vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi Represented ... on 10 December, 2014
Author: Suresh Kait
$~33
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                  Judgment delivered on: 10th December, 2014

+                                 W.P.(C) 4321/2014

        HARDEEP JOHAR & ORS.                                   ..... Petitioners
                    Represented by:             Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior
                                                Advocate with Ms.Tara V.
                                                Ganju, Advocate.

                            Versus

        GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI REPRESENTED BY: SECRETARY
                                                     ..... Respondent
                      Represented by: Mr.Amiet Andlay, Advocate
                                      for Respondents No. 1 to 6.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioners are aggrieved with the demarcation report dated 31.01.2014, which was carried out pursuant to order dated 20.01.2014 passed by the Tehsildar, Saket, New Delhi.

2. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that two suits have been decided in favour of the petitioners and the third suit is still pending before this Court. Despite, the aforesaid demarcation has been carried out maliciously on the complaint of Sh. Hari Kishan S/o Sh. Ram Karan without issuing notice to the petitioners.

3. In short affidavit filed by the respondent No.1, it is specifically stated that the said demarcation does not create right of any of the parties as the

same had been carried out in pursuance of the orders passed by the said Tehsildar on the request of SHO, P.S. Fatehpur Beri, vide its letter dated 03.10.2013.

4. In view of the above recorded facts, the aforesaid demarcation cannot be used by either party as a piece of evidence, however, if any of the party would require the same, the said party can approach the appropriate authority as per law.

5. With the above observations, the instant petition stands disposed of.

SURESH KAIT (JUDGE) DECEMBER 10, 2014 sb

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter