Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kaavya Tea Estate Private Limited ... vs .........
2014 Latest Caselaw 3509 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 3509 Del
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2014

Delhi High Court
Kaavya Tea Estate Private Limited ... vs ......... on 4 August, 2014
Author: Sanjeev Sachdeva
$~33

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NE W DELHI

+      Co. Appl. (M) No. 117/2014


IN THE MATTER OF KAAVYA TEA ESTATE PRIVATE
LIMITED & ORS.

                          Through:     Mr.   Mukesh          Sukhija,
                                       Advocate

       CORA M:

       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

                          ORDER

% 04.08.2014

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)

1. This is a first motion joint Application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short "Act") is in connection with a Scheme of Amalgamation (for short "Scheme") of Kaavya Tea Estate Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor No.1/ Applicant Company No 1 ), Marvel Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor No.2 / Non Applicant Company), Marvel Tea Industries ================================================

Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor No.3 / Applicant Company No. 2) with Marvel Tea Estate (India) Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company/Non Applicant Company) and their respective shareholders (hereinafter referred Transferor Company No.1 and Transferor Company No.3) (collectively referred to as "Applicant Companies") and their respective Shareholders and Creditors . A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed with the Application.

2. The registered office of the Transferor Companies No.1 & 3 is situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and is within the jurisdiction of this Court, while the registered office of the Transferor Company No.2 & the Transferee Company is situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The details with regard to the date of inco rporation of the Applicant Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been set out in application.

4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association, latest Audited Accounts as on 31.03.2013 ================================================

of the Applicant Companies have been enclosed with the Application.

5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submits that no proceeding under Sections 235 to 251 of the Act is pending against the Applicant Companies as on the date of the present Application.

6. The proposed scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of all the Applicant Companies. Certified true copies of the Board Resolutions have been filed along with the Application.

7. The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Companies and the consents obtained from them for the proposed scheme is clearly apparent from the chart given in the application which is as follows:-

Com pa ny    No. o f   Consent    No of      Consent     No of      Consent
             Sha re     Giv en   Secured      Giv en   Unsecured     Giv en
             holder              Credito r              Credito r
Transferor     6       All         Nil         NA         Nil       NA
Compa ny
No 1
Transferor      7      All         Nil         NA            1      All
Compa ny
No 3



================================================

8. A prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders, Secured and Unsecured creditors of the Applicant Companies.

9. In view of the written consents/NOC given by all the Shareholders in Applicant Companies, requirement of convening the meetings of shareholders of Applicant Companies are dispensed with.

10. In view of the written consents/NOC given by the one Unsecured Creditor in the Applicant/Transferor Company No.3, requirement of convening the meetings of Unsecured Creditor in the Applicant/Transferor Company No.3 is dispensed with. Since there are no Unsecured Creditors in the Applicant/Transferor Company No.1 the question of convening the meetings of the Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant/Transferor Company N o.3 does not arise.

11. Since there are no Secured Creditors in the applicant companies the question of convening the meetings of the Secured Creditors of the applicant companies does not arise.

================================================

12. The application is allowed in above terms.

Order Dasti.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

AUGUST 4, 2014

================================================

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter