Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 2179 Del
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. 182 OF 2014
Smt. Janki and another. ........Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others. ...Respondents.
Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. G.S. Negi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent nos. 1 & 2.
Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 to 6.
Coram: Hon'ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.
Hon'ble V.K. Bist, J.
Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral)
Respondent nos. 3 to 6 have been served. They have entered appearance through Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Lalit Sharma, on instructions received by him from his clients, has submitted that his clients never threatened to cause any physical harm to the petitioners, nor in future, they will take any step in that regard. That being the situation, the writ petition is disposed of.
(V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.)
30.04.2014
Rathour
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!