Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 1803 Del
Judgement Date : 2 April, 2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ TR.P (C)No. 86/2013
% 2nd April, 2014
M/S. ADHARSHILA DESIGNS (P) LTD. ......Petitioner
Through: Mr. S. Shantanu Advocate with Mr.
Pratap Shankar, Advocate, Mr. Anand
Kumar Singh, Advocate and Mr.
Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate.
VERSUS
M/S. MVL LIMITED ...... Respondent
Through: Ms. Puja Shrivastava, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. This petition under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
(CPC) cannot be allowed inasmuch as transferring of the suit as prayed for
from Tis Hazari courts to District courts at Saket would be setting aside the
specific circular issued by Hon'ble the Chief Justice of this Court on
19.2.2013 whereby in order to ensure equal distribution of work among
different courts, only some pending cases of Tis Hazari courts were
TR. P(C) 86/2013 Page 1 of 2
transferred to other courts whereas other suits in spite of creation of fresh
district courts continued in the Tis Hazari District courts.
2. Petition is accordingly dismissed in view of aforesaid
observations, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
APRIL 02, 2014 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
Ne
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!