Bharti Axa General Insurance Co ... vs Sahidan & Ors
2013 Latest Caselaw 4224 Del

$~21
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%             Judgment delivered on: 17th September, 2013


+      MAC.APP. 631/2012

BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD        ..... Appellant
                      Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv.

                          versus
SAHIDAN & ORS                                             .... Respondents
                                   Through: Mr. Alamgir, Adv. for R1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the award dated 09.05.2012 whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.8,61,232/- with interest @ 9% from the date of filing of DAR proceedings till the date of payment.

2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has fairly conceded that during the trial it was agreed by the counsels for the Insurance Company and the claimants that no evidence is required to be lead on behalf of the parties; and the case can be decided on the basis of verified DAR proceedings filed by the IO.

3. Therefore, she is not pressing other issues raised in the instant appeal, except the issue that ld. Tribunal has wrongly granted a sum of Rs.21,000/- as Counsel's Fee as there is no provision in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

4. The issue regarding Counsel's fee has been decided by this court in the case of ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Kanti Devi & Ors. in MAC. A. 645/2012 decided on 30.07.2012. Therefore, in view of above noted judgment passed by this court, counsel's fee cannot be granted as the same is contrary to Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

5. consequently, instant appeal is partially allowed.

6. I note pursuant to order dated 31.05.2012, the appellant has deposited the entire award amount (less counsel's fee). 50% of the award amount has already been released. Therefore, the balance compensation amount be released in favour of the respondents / claimants in terms of the order dated 09.05.2012 passed by the ld. Tribunal.

7. Statutory amount be also released in favour of the appellant.

CM. NO. 10336/2012 (Stay) With the disposal of the appeal itself, this application has become infructuous. The same is accordingly disposed of.

SURESH KAIT, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 Jg/RS