Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vam Champignons & Agro Products ... vs --
2013 Latest Caselaw 2971 Del

Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 2971 Del
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2013

Delhi High Court
Vam Champignons & Agro Products ... vs -- on 15 July, 2013
Author: R.V. Easwar
$~28
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                         Date of decision: 15th July, 2013

+      COM. APPL. (M) NO.89 OF 2013

       VAM CHAMPIGNONS & AGRO
       PRODUCTS LTD. & ORS.                     ......Applicants
                    Through: Mr. P. K. Mittal, Advocate for the
                             Applicants.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR

R. V. EASWAR, J.: (ORAL)


1.     This first motion joint application has been filed under Sections

391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('Act') in connection with the

Scheme of Amalgamation ('Scheme') of Vam Champignons & Agro

Products Ltd. and Vignette Investments Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to

as 'Transferor companies') with U.K. Paints (India) Ltd. (hereinafter

referred to as 'Transferee company') [hereinafter collectively referred to

as 'Applicant companies']. A copy of the proposed Scheme is enclosed

with the present application as Annexure- XI.


2.     The registered offices of the Applicant companies are situated

within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and are within the


CO. APPL. (M) 89/2013                                     Page 1 of 4
 jurisdiction of this Court.


3.     The details of the dates of incorporation of the Applicant

companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have

been enclosed with the application.


4.     The copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as

well as the latest audited annual accounts for the year ended 31st March

2012 of the Applicant companies have also been enclosed with the

application as Annexure- I to III and IV to VI respectively.


5.     Learned counsel for the Applicants submits that no proceedings

under Sections 235 to 251 of the Act are pending against any of the

Applicant companies as on the date of the present application.


6.     The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Boards of

Directors ('BoDs') of the Applicant companies. Copies of the board

resolutions have been filed along with the application.


7.     The status of the shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors

of the Applicant companies and the consents obtained by them for the

proposed Scheme is set out in a table forming part of the application

which reads as under:-


CO. APPL. (M) 89/2013                                     Page 2 of 4
 Company       No. of     Consent   No. of     Consent   No. Of Consent
              sharehol   given     secured    given     unsecu given
              ders                 creditor             red
                                   s                    credito
                                                        rs
Transferor    7          ALL       NIL        N.A.      1       ALL
company 1
Transferor    5          ALL       NIL        N.A.      1        ALL
company 2
Transferee    15         ALL       1          ALL       34       33 unsecured
company                                                          creditors in
                                                                 terms of
                                                                 number and
                                                                 more than
                                                                 99.66% in
                                                                 terms of debt.


8.     A prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of

convening the meetings of shareholders of the Applicant companies and

the meeting of secured creditors of the Transferee company and the

meetings of the unsecured creditors of the Transferor companies.

9.     In view of the written consents/NOC obtained and the averments

made in the application, the requirements of convening the abovesaid

separate meetings are dispensed with.


10.    Since none of the Transferor companies have any secured

creditors, the question of convening their meetings does not arise.


11.    It is stated in the application that there are 34 (Thirty Four)

unsecured creditors in the Transferee company, out of which 33 (Thirty

CO. APPL. (M) 89/2013                                        Page 3 of 4
 Three) unsecured creditors in terms of number and more than 99.66 % in

terms of debt, have given their no objection certificates to the proposed

Scheme and a prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement

of convening their meeting.


12.    In view of the written consents/NOC obtained and the averments

made in the application, the requirement of convening the meeting of the

unsecured creditors of the Transferee company is dispensed with.


13.    The application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.


       Order be given dasti.



                                                      R. V. EASWAR, J.

JULY 15, 2013 hs(m)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter