Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Sh. Harikishan & Anr.
2013 Latest Caselaw 3843 Del

Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 3843 Del
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2013

Delhi High Court
Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Sh. Harikishan & Anr. on 30 August, 2013
Author: Suresh Kait
$~27
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                                  Judgment delivered on:30th August, 2013

+                               CM(M) 871/2013

       ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.               ..... Petitioner
                        Through: Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,
                                  Advocates.
                Versus

    SH. HARIKISHAN & ANR.                                    ..... Respondents
                      Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

CM No.13284/2013 (for exemption)

Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 871/2013

1. The present petition is preferred against the impugned order dated 30.05.2013, whereby the right of the petitioner to file written statement was closed.

2. In the claim petition filed before the learned Tribunal, DAR was filed on 22.01.2013 and the petitioner sought time to file written statement. Thereafter, on two consecutive dates, i.e., 22.02.2013 and 26.03.2013, time was sought by the petitioner for filing the written statement; however, the same was not filed.

3. Vide order dated 01.05.2013, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Tribunal granted last opportunity to the petitioner for filing the written statement subject to depositing cost of Rs.2,000/-. Despite that, the petitioner did not file the written statement.

4. Accordingly, having no option, the learned Tribunal has closed the right of the petitioner to file the written statement vide impugned order dated 30.05.2013.

5. In view of the above, I do not find any discrepancy in the order passed by the learned Tribunal. However, in the interest of justice, I allow the instant petition.

6. Consequently, the learned Tribunal is directed to allow the petitioner to file his written statement subject to payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- to be paid in favour of respondent No.1, Sh. Harikishan.

7. In view of the above, the instant petition stands disposed of.

CM No.13285/2013 (for stay)

With the disposal of the petition itself, this application has become infructuous. The same is accordingly dismissed.

A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company.

SURESH KAIT, J.

AUGUST 30, 2013 sb

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter