Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 3580 Del
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) No. 3418/2011
% 13th August , 2013
MS. INDERJIT KAUR ..... Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh and Mr. Saurabh
Tiwari, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. The only relief claimed in this writ petition is for implementation of
the 6th Pay Commission Report with respect to schools in terms of the
circular of the Director of Education dated 11.2.2009. It is not disputed on
behalf of the respondent no.1-school, and more so because I have passed
various judgments on this count, that the petitioner is entitled to benefits in
terms of the circular of the Director of Education dated 11.2.2009.
WPC 3418/2011 Page 1 of 2
2. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed and petitioner is
directed to be paid benefits in terms of the report of the 6 th Pay Commission
as implemented for schools in Delhi by the circular of Director of Education
dated 11.2.2009. Petitioner, if in accordance with the rules, is also entitled
to other consequential benefits on implementation of the 6th Pay
Commission Report petitioner, she will also be given such benefits. Let the
amounts due to the petitioner including arrears, be paid within a period of
four months from today alongwith interest at 6% per annum simple from the
date from which the amounts were due till the date of payment. If the
amounts are not paid within four months then the rate of interest will be
payable at 9% per annum simple. Parties are left to bear their own cost.
AUGUST 13, 2013 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
ib
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!