Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karam Chand vs Ram Nath & Anr.
2012 Latest Caselaw 5989 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 5989 Del
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2012

Delhi High Court
Karam Chand vs Ram Nath & Anr. on 5 October, 2012
Author: G.P. Mittal
*        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                Date of decision: 5th October, 2012
+        MAC. APP. 364/2011

         KARAM CHAND                               ..... Appellant
                            Through:    Ms. Priyanka Rana, Adv.

                                       versus

         RAM NATH & ANR.                           ...... Respondents
                      Through           Mr. S.N. Gupta, Adv. for R-2.

         CORAM:
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
                                 JUDGMENT

G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The Appellant Karam Chand, who was a student pursuing Masters in Social Work, seeks enhancement of compensation of `65,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) for the injuries suffered by him, in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 20.09.2000.

2. Since the accident took place in the vicinity of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, immediately after the accident the Appellant was removed to the said hospital. He was found to have suffered head injury. There was a fracture of occipital bone. The Claims Tribunal found that a sum of `35,610/- was paid to the hospital. In addition to a sum of `40,000/- towards treatment, the Appellant was awarded compensation of `25,000/- towards pain and suffering.

3. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the compensation awarded towards pain, shock and suffering is on the lower side. No compensation has been awarded towards special diet, conveyance charges and attendant charges.

4. The Appellant did not suffer any serious injury or any disability in respect of any limb. He was discharged from the hospital after eight days. The compensation of `25,000/- awarded towards pain, shock and suffering seems to be just and reasonable.

5. Since the Appellant remained in the hospital for eight days and must have taken a couple of weeks to fully recover from the injuries, I would award a lumpsum amount of `5,000/- towards special diet and conveyance and `2,500/- as attendant charges, even if gratuitous services are rendered by some or the other family member.

6. The overall compensation is thus enhanced by `7,500/- which shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the Petition till its payment.

7. The enhanced compensation along with interest shall be deposited with the Claims Tribunal within six weeks and shall be released in favour of the Appellant on deposit.

8. The Appeal is allowed in above terms.

9. Pending Applications stand disposed of.

(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE OCTOBER 05, 2012 vk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter