Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 4406 Del
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2012
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Judgment:25th July, 2012
+ Co. Pet. No. 121/2012
IN THE MATTER OF SHARDA SEJONG AUTO
COMPONENTS ( INDIA) LTD. & ORS.
Through: Mrs. Malini Sud, Advocate with
Mr. Salil Seth and Ms. Aditi
Sharma, Advocates for Petitioner
Companies
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for
Official Liquidator.
Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy
Registrar of Companies for
Regional Director (Northern
Region).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)
1. This second motion joint Petition has been filed under Sections
391(2) and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 by the abovenamed
Petitioner Transferor Company and Transferee Company, seeking
sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of SHARDA SEJONG AUTO
COMPONENTS (INDIA) LIMITED with SHARDA MOTOR
INDUSTRIES LIMITED as amended by the order dated 10.07.2012
passed by this Hon'ble Court.
2. The registered offices of the Petitioner Transferor Company and
Transferee Company are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction
of this Court.
3. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of Petitioner
Transferor and Transferee Company, their authorized, issued, subscribed
and paid up capital have been given in the Petition.
4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as
the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31st March, 2011
of the Petitioner Transferor and Transferee Company have also been
enclosed with the Petition.
5. Copies of the resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of
the Petitioner Companies, approving the Scheme of Amalgamation have
also been placed on record.
6. It has been submitted that no proceedings under Sections 235 to
251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the Petitioner
Companies.
7. So far as the share exchange ratio for amalgamation is concerned,
the Scheme of Amalgamation provides that, upon the Scheme finally
coming into effect, the shares of the Transferor Company (being the
wholly owned subsidiary) of the Transferee Company, shall stand
cancelled and no new equity shares shall be issued to the shareholders of
the Transferor Company in lieu of the shares held by the Transferee
Company. Subsequently, upon the coming into effect of this Scheme,
the authorized Share Capital of the Transferee Company shall
automatically stand increased without any further act, deed or thing on
the part of the Transferee Company including payment of stamp duty
and fees, if any, payable to the concerned Registrar of Companies under
the Companies Act, 1956, by the authorized share capital of the
Transferor Company amounting to Rs. 250,000,000/-, which would be
reorganized in the following manner:
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
(In Lacs)
Authorised:
50,000,000 Equity Share of Rs. 10/- Each 5000.00
TOTAL
Issued, Subscribed & Paid-Up
5,946,326 Equity Share of 10/- Each 594.63
TOTAL 594.63
8. The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed C.A. (M) No. 4 of
2012, seeking directions of this Court for dispensation / convening of
meetings of their shareholders and the creditors. Vide order dated
04.01.2012 this Court allowed the Application and dispensed with the
requirement of convening the meetings of Shareholders of the
Transferor Company. The Court also dispensed with the requirement of
convening the meetings of the Secured and the Unsecured Creditors of
the Transferor Company as there were none. Further, the Court directed
that separate meetings of the Shareholders, Secured and Unsecured
Creditors of the Transferee Company shall be held on 18.02.2012 at the
India Habitat Centre, New Delhi at 11.00 a.m., 2.00 p.m. and 3.30 p.m.
respectively. In the meetings directed by this Court, the Scheme was
approved unanimously by those who were present and voting.
9. The Transferor and Transferee Company have thereafter, filed
the present Petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation.
Vide order dated 16.03.2012, notice in the Petition was directed to be
issued to the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official
Liquidator. Citations were also directed to be published in 'Financial
Express' (English Delhi Edition) and 'Veer Arjun' (Hindi Delhi
Edition). Affidavit of Service and Publication has been filed on behalf of
the Petitioners Companies on 07.07.2012, showing
compliance regarding service of the Petition on the Regional Director,
Northern Region and the Official Liquidator and also regarding
publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 10.04.2012.
Copies of the newspaper's cutting, in original, containing the
publications have been filed along with the Affidavit of Service filed on
behalf of the Petitioner Companies.
10. An Application being C. A. (M) No. 1254/2012 under Rule 9 of
the Company Court Rules, 1959 was also filed on behalf of the
Petitioners, inter alia, praying as follows -:
"......a. pass an order to the effect that typographical error in clause 19.4 in the Scheme of Amalgamation as stated in para 3 above stands corrected; and b... pass an order stating that date 01.04.2011 will be read in place of 01.04.2013 in clause 19.4......"
By an order dated 10.07.2012, passed by the Hon'ble Court the
said Application was allowed and it was held that the date mentioned in
line 3 of clause 19.4 of the scheme shall read as 01.04.2013 and not
01.04.2011, which was accepted as being an obvious typographical
error.
11. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator
sought information from the Petitioner Companies. Based on the
information received, the Official Liquidator has filed his Report dated
11.07.2012 wherein he has stated that there is nothing to show that the
affairs of the transferor Company have in any manner been conducted
prejudicial to the interest of its members or to public interest.
12. In response to the notices issued in the Petition, Mr. K.S.
Pradhan, Regional Director (Northern Region) Ministry of Corporate
Affairs, has filed his Affidavit dated 11.07.2012. Relying on Clause 7.1
of Part - II of the Scheme of Amalgamation, he has stated that upon
sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation, all the employees of
the Transferor Company shall become the employees of the Transferee
Company without any break or interruption in their services upon
sanctioning of the Scheme of Amalgamation by the Court.
13. No objection has been received to the Scheme from any other
party. Ms. Malini Sud, learned counsel for Petitioner Companies
Company, has filed an affidavit dated 24.07.2012, confirming that
neither the Petitioner Companies nor has she received any objection
pursuant to citations published in the newspapers.
14. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and
Creditors of the Petitioner Companies; representation / reports filed by
the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator,
attached with this Court to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation,
there appears to be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to
the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioner Companies will comply with the
statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of the
order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the
date of receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of sections 391
and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, and in terms of the Scheme of
Amalgamation, the whole or part of the undertakings, the properties,
rights and powers of the Transferor Company be transferred to and vest
in the Transferee Company, without any further act or deed. Similarly,
in terms of the Scheme of Amalgamation, all the liabilities and duties of
the Transferor Company be transferred to the Transferee Company,
without any further act or deed. Upon the Scheme of Amalgamation
coming into effect, the Transferor Company shall stand dissolved
without winding up. It is, however, clarified that this order will not be
construed as an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty
or taxes or any other charges, if payable in accordance with any law or
permission / compliance with any other requirement which may be
specifically required under any law.
15. The Petitioner Companies would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs.
1,00,000/- in the Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator within
three weeks from today.
16. The Petition is allowed in the above terms.
17. Order dasti.
INDERMEET KAUR, J JULY 25, 2012 rb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!