Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Axis Convergence Private Limited vs ----
2012 Latest Caselaw 4294 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 4294 Del
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2012

Delhi High Court
Axis Convergence Private Limited vs ---- on 20 July, 2012
Author: Indermeet Kaur
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                            Date of Judgment:20.07.2012


+     COMPANY PETITION NO.118 OF 2012


Axis Convergence Private Limited          ...Transferor   Company-1/
                                           Petitioner Company-1
                  AND



Visesh Infotecnics Limited                  ...Transferee Company-2/
                                             Petitioner Company-2

                        Through :- Mr. P Nagesh with Mr. Rishi
                                   Sood Advocate for Petitioner
                                   Companies
                                   Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Dy. Registrar
                                   of Companies for the Regional
                                   Director
                                   Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
                                   official Liquidator


      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR


INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)

1 This second motion joint petition has been filed under Sections

391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner Companies

seeking sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement (For Short Scheme) of

Axis Convergence Private limited (Transferor Company) with Visesh

Infotecnics Limited (Transferee Company).

2 The registered office of the petitioner Transferor and Transferee

Companies are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this

Hon‟ble Court.

3 The petitioner companies had earlier filed C.A. (M) No. 169 of

2011 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation/ convening of

meetings. Vide order dated 5th January 2012, this Court allowed the

application and dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings

of Equity Shareholders , Secured and Unsecured Creditors of Transferor

Company and directed convening of meetings of Equity Shareholders

and Secured Creditors of Transferee company under the Supervision of

the Court.

4 The separate meetings of Equity Shareholders and Secured

Creditors of the Transferee Company were duly convened on 18 th

February 2012 at Bipin Chandra Pal Memorial Trust, A-81, Chittranjan

Park, New Delhi-110019 and the Chairpersons appointed by this court

have filed their reports which are on record. As per the Chairpersons

Report, the Scheme has been unanimously approved by the Equity

Shareholders and Secured Creditors of the Transferee Company.

5 The petitioner Transferor companies have thereafter filed the

present petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement vide

order dated 16.03.2012, notice in the Petition was directed to be issued

to the Regional Director, Northern Region, the Official Liquidator and

to the Unsecured Creditor „M/s. Global Absolute Research Private

Limited‟. Citations were also directed to be published in "Business

Standard" (English, Delhi Edition) and "Jansatta" (Hindi Delhi Edition).

Affidavit of service and publication has been filed by the petitioners

showing compliance regarding service of the petition on the Regional

Director, Northern Region, the Official Liquidator and to the Unsecured

creditor „M/s. Global Absolute Research Private Limited‟ and also

regarding Publication of Citations in the aforesaid News papers on 5th

July 2012, copies of the news papers cuttings, in original, containing the

publications have been filed with the affidavit of service.

6 Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought

information from the Petitioner Companies. Based on the information

received the official liquidator has filed his report dated 17.07.2012

stating that he has not received any complaint against the proposed

Scheme from any person/ party interested in the Scheme in any manner

and that the affairs of the Transferor company do not appear to have

been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members,

creditors or to public interest.

7 In response to the notices issued in the Petition, learned Regional

Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs has filed his

affidavit / report dated 16th July 2012. Relying on clause 2.16 of Part-II

of the Scheme of Arrangement, he has stated that , upon sanction of the

Scheme of Arrangement all the employees of the Transferor company

shall become the employees of Transferee Company without any break

or interruption in their services upon sanctioning of the Scheme of

arrangement by the Hon‟ble Court.

8 Further, the Regional Director in Para 5 of the affidavit Mr. B.K.

Bansal, Regional director have observed that the Bombay Stock

Exchange vide letter dated 28th November, 2011 has given „No

Objection‟ to the proposed scheme of Arrangement wherein the

Petitioner Company has undertaken to lock in 25% of the new equity

Shares i.e. 1,48,47,379 Equity Shares For a period of three Years from

the date of listing of new shares at BSE.

9 In pursuance to the aforesaid observation the Counsel for the

Petitioner Companies undertakes to lock in 25% of new Equity shares

for a period of three years from the date of listing of new shares at BSE

and the said undertaking shall be furnished before the Bombay Stock

Exchange within three weeks from today. In pursuance to the

undertaking given by the Counsel for the petitioner Company the

objections raised by Regional Director no longer survive.

10 Further, the Petitioner Companies in pursuance to the order dated

16th March 2012 have served a Copy of the Notice along with the Copy

of the Company Petition to the unsecured Creditor namely „M/s. Global

Absolute Research Private Limited‟ through Speed Post and Courier

Receipt dated 10th July 2012. However, No objection has been received

from the said Creditor till date.

11 No objection has been received to the Scheme of Arrangement

from any other party, Mr. Peeyush Aggarwal, Director of Transferor and

Transferee Companies has filed an affidavit dated 16 th July 2012

confirming that neither the petitioner companies nor their Legal Counsel

has received any objection pursuant to the citations published in the

Newspapers.

12 Even today, during the course of hearing, Mr K.S. Pradhan

Deputy Registrar of Companies for Regional Director (Northern

Region), Mr. Rajiv Bahl appearing for the Official Liquidator state that

they have no objection to the present scheme being sanctioned.

13 In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and

Creditors of the petitioner Companies, representations/ reports filed by

the Regional Director, Northern Region and the official liquidator ,

attached with this court to the proposed scheme of Arrangement, there

appears to be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of

Arrangement. Consequently sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of

Arrangement under Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner companies will comply with the statutory requirements in

accordance with law. Certified copy of the order be filed with the

Registrar of Companies within 30 days from receipt of the same. In

terms of the provisions of Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act,

1956 and in terms of the Scheme, the whole or part of the undertaking,

the property, rights and powers of the Transferor company be

transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company without any further

act or deed. Similarly, in terms of the Scheme , all the liabilities and

duties of the Transferor Company be transferred to the Transferee

company without any further act or deed. Upon the Scheme coming into

effect, the Transferor Company shall stand dissolved without winding

up. It is, however, clarified that this order will not be construed as an

order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty or taxes or any

other charges, if payable in accordance with any law; or permission/

compliance with any other requirement which may be specifically

required under any law.

14 Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioner

Companies would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- in the

Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator within three weeks from

today. The statement is accepted.

15    The petition is allowed in the above terms.


16       Order Dasti




                                           INDERMEET KAUR, J
JULY 20, 2012
A





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter