Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 379 Del
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) No.1306/2007
Decided on: 19.01.2012
IN THE MATTER OF
GANGA VIHAR RW ASSOCIATION & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through : Mohd. Sajid, Adv.
versus
UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. R.V. Sinha, Adv. for R-1/UOI.
Mr. V.K. Tandon, Adv. for R-2/
Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
CORAM
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HIMA KOHLI, J. (ORAL)
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners
seeking directions to the respondents not to dispossess forty one petitioners,
members of the petitioner No.1 Association, or disturb their possession in
the colony known as Ganga Vihar.
2. It is the case of the petitioners that since the year 1986, they
are the resident members residing in the colony named Ganga Vihar, Village
Kilokari, Ring Road, New Delhi, and had purchased plots from the original
owners on which structures had been constructed by them comprising of
Khasras No.530/1, 532/1, 1260, 535/1, 491/1, 522/1-6, 520/1/1, 521/1,
517 and 519, Village Kilokari, Ring Road, New Delhi. It is averred in the
writ petition that in the year 1987, the colony in question came into
existence and the residents and the members of the petitioner/Association
started residing there with their families. In the year 1990, the colony
applied to respondent No.2/Govt. of NCT of Delhi for being regularized. An
acknowledgement receipt dated 31.1.2005 was issued by respondent
No.2/Govt. of NCT of Delhi acknowledging the receipt of an application for
regularization of the unauthorized colony, which is placed on record as
Annexure P-1. It is stated that the name of the colony of the
petitioners/Association features at item No.300 in a list of 1432 colonies,
which have applied for seeking regularization (Annexure P-1).
3. The petitioners claim that during the pendency of the aforesaid
application for regularization, on 14.12.2006, the staff of respondent
No.2/Govt. NCT of Delhi and that of respondent No.3/DDA visited the said
colony with police force for undertaking demolition action. Aggrieved by the
aforesaid demolition action, the petitioners submitted a representation to the
respondents on 22.2.2006 and on 22.1.2007 and thereafter filed the present
writ petition on 19.2.2007 with the prayer, as mentioned herein above.
4. When the present writ petition was listed on 22.2.2007, counsel
for respondent No.3/DDA had stated that there was a willful suppression of
material facts in the writ petition and he had sought time to place on record
the photographs and other relevant documents required to substantiate the
said submission. As a result, he was directed to file an affidavit.
5. A short affidavit was filed by OSD (LM), DDA on 24.4.2007 and
an additional affidavit was filed by the Director (Land Management), DDA on
23.7.2010 wherein, it was stated that the petitioners had not approached
the Court with clean hands and had deliberately concealed material facts. It
was averred that the land in question was acquired land and physical
possession thereof was handed over by the LAC, Land & Building
Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi to respondent No.3/DDA on 27.12.1990
and on 9.2.2007. A copy of the possession report was placed on record
along with the earlier affidavit dated 24.4.2007. It was further submitted
that the land in question was lying vacant and there was no colony in
existence on the subject land. It was thus stated that the present petition
was an attempt on the part of the petitioners/Association to grab
Government land, which is impermissible. In para 5 of the affidavit, it was
submitted that even otherwise, the purported provisional regularization that
the petitioners were relying upon is only a copy of an acknowledgement
receipt issued by Govt. of NCT of Delhi, acknowledging an application for
regularization submitted by the petitioner/Association on 31.1.2005.
6. On 27.10.2008, respondent No.3/DDA addressed a letter to the
Principal Secretary (Urban Development), Govt. of NCT of Delhi, to provide it
a copy of the layout plan and other documents submitted by the RWA of
Ganga Vihar with its application for purposes of verification. Upon physical
verification, it transpired that there is no colony existing on the land in
question. A copy of the letter dated 23.10.2008 addressed by the
Commissioner (L.M.), DDA to the Principal Secretary (UD), Govt. of NCT of
Delhi is enclosed as Annexure-E to the aforesaid affidavit. The contents of
the aforesaid letter are reproduced herein below:
"Sir,
I would like to bring to your kind notice that unauthorized colony namely, Ganga Vihar, Kilokari near Kalindi Colony, Delhi-14, appearing at S.No.390 in the list of 1432 unauthorized colonies has been physically verified by the official of DDA. It has been reported that no such colony exists at the site. It appears that some vested interests have included the name of this colony in order to grab the vacant DDA land in the area.
I would like to request you kindly make available the copies of layout plan and other documents submitted by this colony for immediate verification. In the meantime, I would also like to request you not to consider the regularization of this colony.
With regards."
7. The aforesaid letter was duly acknowledged by Principal
Secretary (UD), Govt. of NCT of Delhi, vide reply dated 24.12.2008 and an
assurance was given to DDA that the concerned file pertaining to the colony
in question had been forwarded to Director, Unauthorized Cell, DDA for
scrutiny and verification and the colony's request for regularization would be
taken only in the light of verification reports received from the DDA and the
concerned local bodies.
8. Counsels for the respondents No.1 and 2 submit that the layout
plan attached by the petitioners/Association with their application for
seeking regularization of the alleged unauthorized colony by the name of
Ganga Vihar Residents Welfare Association is a fake plan inasmuch as no
such colony was found in existence at the site. It is further stated that the
Deputy Director (LM) SEZ, DDA had written an internal letter dated
25.9.2009 to the Director (UC) Planning, DDA informing the aforesaid officer
that the revenue staff had visited the area in question and reported that
there was no colony existing at the site, whereas the plan for regularization
of the subject colony submitted by the RWA showed otherwise. It was
further stated in the said letter that presently the subject land is protected
by a stone boundary wall constructed around it by the DDA and sign boards
had been displayed thereon. Lastly, it was stated that a detailed report with
the recommendation that the colony did not qualify for regularization had
been forwarded to the Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Along with its affidavit, the
respondent No.3/DDA has placed on record the photographs of the area in
question which shows existence of a stone wall bounding the area, however,
there do not exist any built-up structures on the land in question.
9. It is pertinent to note that the petitioners/Association have not
rejoined to the affidavits filed by respondent No.3/DDA till date. As a result,
the averments made in the said affidavits are deemed to be true and
correct.
10. Having regard to the averments made in the aforesaid affidavit,
this Court is of the opinion that the present petition filed by the
petitioners/Association is a gross abuse of the process of the Court and is a
blatant attempt on the part of the petitioners/Association to grab
Government land under the garb of seeking regularization of an
unauthorized colony. The falsity of the present petition is borne out from
the prayer clause itself, wherein the petitioners have averred that the colony
in question known as Ganga Vihar Residents Welfare Association, is part of
the list of the approved colonies. The aforesaid submission is patently false
for the reason that the only document placed on record by the
petitioners/Association is a copy of the acknowledgment receipt dated
31.1.2005 issued by Govt. of NCT of Delhi, a perusal of which shows that the
Resident Welfare Association of Ganga Vihar had only submitted an
application for regularization of the unauthorized colony and Ganga Vihar is
not a part of the list of approved colonies. Further, no provisional
regularization certificate has been issued by respondent No.2/ Govt. of NCT
of Delhi in favour of the petitioners, and therefore, the question of placing
the same on record does not arise.
11. In these circumstances, the present petition is dismissed as
being devoid of merits and on account of concealment of material facts by
the petitioners, costs of `1,00,000/- is imposed on the petitioners. The
costs shall be paid by all the petitioners proportionately and deposited with
respondent No.3/DDA within four weeks. In case the petitioners fail to
deposit the costs imposed, the same shall be treated as arrears of the land
revenue to be recovered from them, in accordance with law.
(HIMA KOHLI)
JANUARY 19, 2012 JUDGE
sk/rkb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!