Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Madhu Panchal & Anr vs State & Anr
2012 Latest Caselaw 354 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 354 Del
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2012

Delhi High Court
Madhu Panchal & Anr vs State & Anr on 18 January, 2012
Author: Suresh Kait
$~35
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI


+        CRL.M.C. 191/2012

%               Judgment delivered on:18th January, 2012



         MADHU PANCHAL & ANR                 ..... Petitioners
                    Through : Mr. K.B.B. Singh, Adv.


                        versus


         STATE & ANR                       ..... Respondents
                                 Through : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for
State.


CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT



SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

CRL. M.A. 712/2012(Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL. M.C. 191/2012
1        Notice issued.
2        Learned APP accepts notice on behalf of State/respondent No. 1.
3        Respondent No. 2 is personally present in the court today.



 4     Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide FIR No.

267 dated 21.11.2010, a case under Sections 420/120- B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 was registered against the petitioners on the complaint of respondent No.2 at P.S. Karawal Nagar. 5 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and respondent No. 2 does not want to pursue the case further.

6 Respondent No. 2 is present in the court today and he has been duly identified by IO/SI Ashwani Ambaria,P.S. Karawal Nagar. He submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, he does not want to pursue the matter further. He has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

7 Learned APP for State submits that the offence committed under Section 120B Indian Penal Code, 1860 is non-compoundable in nature. 8 Learned APP referred the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr. in SLP (Crl.) No.8989/2010 wherein the Division Bench of the Supreme Court has referred three earlier decisions viz, B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana (2003) 4 SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. (2008) 9 SCC 677 & Manoj Sharma v. State & Ors. (2008) 16 SCC 1 to the larger Bench for re-consideration whether the abovesaid three decisions were decided correctly or not. Therefore, she has prayed that till the matter is decided by the larger Bench of the Apex Court, instant petition may be adjourned sine-die. Alternatively, she prayed that in the event, the FIR is quashed, heavy costs should be imposed upon the petitioners, as the government machinery has been used and precious

time of the Court has been consumed.

9 The Division Bench of Mumbai High Court in Nari Motiram Hira v. Avinash Balkrishnan & Anr. in Crl.W.P.No.995/2010 decided on 03.02.2011 has permitted for compounding of the offences of 'non- compoundable' category as per Section 320 Cr. P.C. even after discussing Gian Singh (supra).

10 Therefore, I feel that unless and until, the decisions which have been referred above, are set aside or altered, by the larger Bench of the Supreme Court, all the above three decision hold the field and are the binding precedents.

11 Further submits that if this court is inclined to quash the FIR, heavy costs shall be imposed upon the petitioners as in the process, Government Machinery has been consumed and the precious time of the court has been mis-used.

12 I find force in the submissions made by learned APP for State. 13 I, accordingly direct petitioner No. 1 to pay a costs of Rs.15,000/- and petitioner No. 2 to pay a costs of Rs.25,000/- in favour of Nursery Primary School for Mentally Retarded Children, Mayur Vihar, Delhi, within a period of 02 weeks from today. Proof of the payment of costs shall be placed on record.

14 The principal/Head Master of the above mentioned School is directed to keep the above mentioned costs of Rs.40,000/- in FDR initially for a period of 02 years with any Nationalized bank and thereafter, get the FDR renewed periodically. The interest accrued

thereon shall be utilized for the well being of the needy children of the school.

15 Accordingly, in view of above discussion and in the interest of justice, I quash the FIR No. 267/2010 registered at P.S. Karawal Nagar, North-East District, Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.

16    Criminal M.C. 191/2012 is disposed of.

17    Dasti.



                                       SURESH KAIT, J

JANUARY 18, 2012
j





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter