Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hcl Comnet Systems & Services ... vs ----------------------
2012 Latest Caselaw 7019 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 7019 Del
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2012

Delhi High Court
Hcl Comnet Systems & Services ... vs ---------------------- on 7 December, 2012
Author: Indermeet Kaur
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                                     Date of Judgment:07.12.2012

+     Company Application (M) No. 187/2012

            IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
      (1 OF 1956)
                     SECTIONS 391 & 394

                                AND

        IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT

      HCL COMNET SYSTEMS & SERVICES LIMITED

                                  HCLSS/APPLICANT COMPANY-I

                                AND

      HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

                                   HCLT/APPLICANT COMPANY-II

                           Through: Mr. NPS Chawla and Ms. Simran
                                  Sethi, Advocates for the Applicants

      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)

1. This is a first motion joint Application under Sections 391 and

394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'Act') in connection with the

Scheme of Arrangement (for short 'Scheme') of HCL Comnet Systems

& Services Limited and HCL Technologies Limited. A copy of the

proposed Scheme of Arrangement is filed along with the Application.

2. The registered offices of the Applicant Companies are situated

within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and are within the

jurisdiction of this Court.

3. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of the Applicant

Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have

been given in the Application.

4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as

the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 30th June, 2012 of

both the Applicant Companies have also been enclosed with the

Application.

5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submitted that no

proceedings under sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are

pending against any of the Applicant Companies as on the date of the

present Application.

6. The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Board of

Directors of both the Applicant Companies. Copies of the Board

Resolutions have been filed along with the Application.

7. The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Un-secured Creditors

of the Applicant Companies and the consents obtained from them for the

proposed Scheme is clearly apparent from the chart given in the

application which is as below:

Company No. of Consent No. of Consent No. of Consent

Share Given Secured Given Un- Given secured Holders Credito rs Creditors

HCLSS/Ap 18 10 2 All 102 Consents plicant not Company -I obtained

HCLT/ 79089 Consents 6 All 1071 Consents Applicant not not Company - obtained obtained II

8. A prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of

convening meetings of the Equity shareholders and Unsecured Creditors

of HCLSS/Applicant Company -I and for the Unsecured Creditors of

HCLT/ Applicant Company -II. Further, separate meetings of the

Secured Creditors of the HCLSS/Applicant Company -I and Equity

Shareholders, Secured Creditors of the HCLT/ Applicant Company -II

are proposed to be held under the supervision of this Court.

9. In view of the written consents/ NOC given by 99.97% of the

Equity Shareholders of HCLSS/Applicant Company -I representing

majority in number and more than 3/4th in value of the total Equity

Shareholders, the requirement of convening meeting of Equity

Shareholders of HCLSS/Applicant Company -I has been dispensed

with.

10. In view of the reasons stated in paragraph 6 page 14 of the

Company Application (Main) No. 187/2012, the requirement of

convening the meeting of the Unsecured Creditors of the

HCLSS/Applicant Company - I has been dispensed with. The reasons

stated therein are as follows:

(a) That HCLT/Applicant Company-II is a public listed company

who's net worth post demerger is Rs. 6810.06 Cr which in

comparison to the pre demerger net worth of Rs. 935.50 Cr. of

HCLSS/Applicant Company -I is much higher. Copy of the

certificate confirming the pre and post demerger net worth of

HCLSS/Applicant Company-I and HCLT/Applicant Company-II,

duly certified by PRYD Associates, Chartered Accountants, have

also been enclosed with the Application.

(b) On becoming the unsecured creditors of HCLT/Applicant

Company-II, the unsecured creditors of HCLSS/Applicant Company

-I shall be benefitted with a better liquidity position in comparison to

the liquidity position they were previously enjoying as the unsecured

creditors of HCLSS/Applicant Company -I. The liquid assets

(including the cash and bank balances) of HCLSS pre demerger are

to the tune of Rs.812.43 Cr whereas the liquid assets (including the

cash and bank balances) of HCLT post demerger amounts to

Rs.5142.48 Cr. Copy of the certificate confirming the pre and post

demerger liquidity position of HCLSS/Applicant Company-I and

HCLT/Applicant Company-II, duly certified by PRYD Associates,

Chartered Accountants, have also been enclosed with the

Application.

11. Further, in view of the reasons stated in paragraph 9 page 18 of

the Company Application (Main) No. 187/2012, the requirement of

convening a meeting of the Unsecured Creditors of the HCLT/

Applicant Company -II has been dispensed with. The reasons stated

therein are as follows:

(a) That the proposed Scheme will not affect the rights of the

unsecured creditors of HCLT/Applicant Company-II as no

sacrifice or waiver is called from them. It may be noted that the

liabilities of the demerged undertaking that are being transferred

are to the tune of Rs. 186.74 crores whereas the assets of the

demerged undertaking of HCLSS/Applicant Company-I as on the

appointed date (Rs. 1,151.44 crores),being transferred to

HCLT/Applicant Company-II are much higher vis-à-vis the

liabilities being transferred. Accordingly, it is stated by the

Applicants that the interest of the unsecured creditors of HCLT /

Applicant Company-II shall not be prejudicially affected. The

liabilities of the Demerged Undertaking being transferred to

HCLT/Applicant Company-II, can be comfortably paid from the

assets being taken over. In fact after paying off the liabilities,

there will be a surplus of Rs. 964.70 Crores left with HCLT after

giving effect to the demerger.

(b) Also as a result of the demerger the net worth of HCLT/Applicant

Company-II will be increased by Rs. 831.81 Crores. The post

demerger net worth of HCLT/Applicant Company-II which is

approx. Rs. 6810.06 Cr. is much higher vis-à-vis the pre demerger

net worth of HCLT/Applicant Company-II (Rs. 5978.25 Cr.).

Copy of the certificate certifying the pre and post demerger net

worth of HCLT/Applicant Company-II, duly certified by PRYD

Associates, Chartered Accountants, have also been enclosed with

the Application. Accordingly, it is stated by the Applicants that

the unsecured creditors of the HCLT/Applicant Company-II shall

stand benefited from the proposed demerger.

12. Separate meetings of Secured Creditors of the HCLSS/Applicant

Company -I and Equity Shareholders, Secured Creditors of HCLT/

Applicant Company -II are proposed to be held under the supervision of

this Court. Consequently, I direct that separate meetings of Secured

Creditors of the HCLSS/Applicant Company-I and Equity

Shareholders, Secured Creditors of HCLT/Applicant Company-II shall

be held on 19th day of January 2013 at 10:30 A.M., 3:30 P.M., 01:00

P.M and respectively, at FICCI Auditorium, Federation House, 1,

Tansen Marg, New Delhi-110001.

13. Ms. Saroj Kaith, Advocate, Cell No. 9968261181 is appointed as

the Chairperson and Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Advocate, Cell

No.9811156437 is appointed as the Alternate Chairperson for the

meeting of Secured Creditors of the HCLSS/Applicant Company -I.

They would be paid a fee of Rs.50,000/- each. Mr. Hari Lal, Cell

No.9899600264 and Mr. Phool Chand Gupta, official of the Court, Cell

No. 8586057409 shall provide secretarial assistance to the Chairperson

and the Alternate Chairperson. They shall be paid a fee of `10,000/- each

for this purpose.

14. Mr. Kartik Nayar, Advocate, Cell No.9810426989 is appointed

as the Chairperson and Mr. Sunil Fernandis, Advocate, Cell

No.9891639491 is appointed as the Alternate Chairperson for the

meeting of Equity Shareholders of the HCLT/ Applicant Company -II.

They would be paid a fee of Rs.50,000/- each. Mr. Prem, Cell

No.9958713230 and Mr. Surender Kumar, Cell No. 9873660764 shall

provide secretarial assistance to the Chairperson and the Alternate

Chairperson. They shall be paid a fee of Rs. 10,000/- each for this

purpose.

15. Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Advocate, Cell No.9810220522 is

appointed as the Chairperson and Mr. Apurv Chandola, Advocate, Cell

No.9650982102 is appointed as the Alternate Chairperson for the

meeting of Secured Creditors of the HCLT/ Applicant Company -II.

They would be paid a fee of Rs.50,000/- each. Ms. Vandana Chhibber,

Cell No. 9868149282 and Mr Rajender Singh, Cell No. 9968124350

shall provide secretarial assistance to the Chairperson and the Alternate

Chairperson. They shall be paid a fee of Rs. 10,000/- each for this

purpose.

16. The Applicant Companies are also directed to publish advance

notice of the aforesaid proposed meetings in 'Business Standard'

(English, Delhi Edition) and 'Business Standard' (Hindi, Delhi Edition).

The advertisements shall be published minimum 21 days in advance

before the scheduled date of meetings.

17. Individual notices of the proposed meetings would be sent by

ordinary post minimum 21 days in advance before the scheduled date of

meetings. The Chairperson will ensure that dispatch is made under

his/her supervision/or his authorized representative.

18. The quorum of the Secured Creditors of the Transferor

Company is fixed as follows:

                      Company              Secured
                                           Creditors

                                         No.      %

                   Transferor              1     10%
                   Company




19. The quorum of the Equity Shareholders and Secured Creditors

of the Transferee Company are fixed as follows:

              Company             Equity         Secured
                                                 Creditors
                                Shareholders

                                         %      NO.     %

         Transferee             5000   10%       1      10%
         Company




20. It is also directed that if the Quorum is not present in the

meetings, the meetings would be adjourned for 30 minutes and the

persons present (either by proxy or in person) in the meetings would be

treated as proper quorum.

21. Voting by proxy is permitted provided that the proxy in the

prescribed form and duly signed by the person entitled to attend and

vote at the aforesaid meetings or by his authorised representative, is

filed with the Company at its registered office, not later than 48 hours

before the said meetings.

22. The Chairman/Alternate Chairman shall file their reports

within 2 weeks of the conclusion of the respective meetings.

23. The application stand allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Order Dasti.

INDERMEET KAUR, J

DECEMBER 07, 2012 ns

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter