Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Parvez Alam & Ors vs State & Anr
2011 Latest Caselaw 5815 Del

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 5815 Del
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2011

Delhi High Court
Parvez Alam & Ors vs State & Anr on 29 November, 2011
Author: Suresh Kait
$~26
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+              CRL.M.C. No. 3930/2011

%              Judgment delivered on:29th November, 2011

PARVEZ ALAM & ORS              ..... Petitioner
                 Through: Mr.V.K. Malik and Mr. Rahul Raj
                 Malik, Advs.

                    versus


STATE & ANR                       ..... Respondent
                             Through: Mr.Naveen Sharma, APP for State.
                             Mr. Salim Ahmed, Adv. for respondent no.2.
                             SI Rajeev Vats IO and SI Shanti Prasad,
                             DIU/South East.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT


SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

CRL. M.A. 18538/2011

Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Criminal M.A. stands disposed of.

+      CRL. M.C. 3930/2011

1.     Notice issued.

2. Ld. APP accepts notice behalf of State.

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that vide FIR no. 111

dated 28.04.2010 case under Section 384/34 IPC was registered against the petitioners on the complaint of respondent no. 2 at Police Station New Friends Colony.

4. He further submits that respondent no. 2 has amicably settled all the issues qua the aforesaid FIR and he is no more interested to pursue the case further.

5. Respondent no. 2 is personally present in the Court with his Counsel Sh. Salim Ahmed. On instruction he submits that respondent no. 2 has received a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- from the family of Sadaqat Ali and he has settled all the issues qua aforesaid FIR and he is no more interested to pursue the case further. He further submits that respondent no. 2 has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

6. Ld. APP on the other submits that if this Court is inclined to quash the FIR, heavy cost be imposed on the petitioner as the government machinery has been pressed and precious time of the court has been consumed.

7. Keeping the settlement into view and the statement of respondent no. 2, I quash the FIR No. 111/10 and emanating proceedings thereto.

8. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners on instruction submit that petitioners wish to contribute some amount for the welfare purposes. Petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- each in favour of School for Deaf, Sector-4, Rohini, Delhi within 2 weeks from today.

9. The Principal / Head Master of the said school is further directed to keep the total amount of Rs.20,000/- in FDR initially for a

period of one year and thereafter shall be renewed periodically. Interest accrued thereon shall be utilized for the needy children of the school.

10. It is made clear that contribution given by the petitioners is given voluntarily and shall not come any way in their service.

11. Crl.M.C.3930/2011 is accordingly allowed on the above terms.

12. Since Crl.M.C.3930/2011 is allowed, Crl.M.A.18537/2011 (Stay) become infructuous and dismissed as such.

13. Dasti.

SURESH KAIT, J

NOVEMBER 29, 2011 jg

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter