Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 1837 Del
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WP(C) No. 13185-86/2005
% Date of Decision: 29.03.2011
UOI & Anr. ......Petitioners
Through Nemo
Versus
Girish Pal & Ors. ...... Respondents
Through Mr. Sunil Mund, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may NO
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be NO
reported in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
* The respondents were the casual labourers who were accorded
temporary status and later on they were regularized against Group 'D'
Post. The dispute had arisen as to from which date their services are to
be counted for grant of benefit of regularization.
The Tribunal relying on the judgment of Andra Pradesh in
General Manager Vs. Sheikh Abdul Khoda, 2004 (2) ATJ HGC (AP) 23
had held that on regularization of a temporary status casual laborer his
full service from the date temporary status is granted upto the date of
regularization is to be counted for pension and half service for the
period before grant of temporary status. Relying on the judgment of
the Andhra Pradesh, the Tribunal thus held that seniority shall
commence for the respondents from the date of their regular
appointments in Group 'D', but the qualifying service shall be computed
for the respondents from the date the temporary status was granted to
them.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioners. The writ petition is
therefore, dismissed in default.
The interim order dated 7th September, 2005 is vacated.
All the pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
March 29, 2011. VEENA BIRBAL, J.
'rs'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!