Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 1534 Del
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7870/2010
Date of Decision:16th March, 2011
R P DUBEY ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. A.K.Jain, Advocate
versus
UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, Advocate
with Mr. Mohit Auluck, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral)
1. This matter is similar to Writ Petition (C) No.7146/2010,
titled P.S. Gupta v. Union of India & Ors., decided by a separate
order passed today, and consequently, for the reasons stated
therein, and since an adequate alternative remedy is available to
the petitioner under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, this Court is
not inclined to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article
226 of the Constitution, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach
the appropriate authority, as per law.
2. It is made clear that no opinion is being expressed on
WP(C) No.7870/2010 Page 1 of 2
the merits of the case of either side, and further, an opportunity is
granted to the petitioner to pursue his claim, if any, before the
appropriate authority under the Act. Provided any such claim is
moved within four weeks from today, the time spent by the
petitioner before this Court shall be excluded for the purposes of
limitation.
3. The petition is dismissed in the above terms.
4. Dasti to counsel for the parties.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
MARCH 16, 2011 sl/dr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!